Here’s my disagreement. First of all, I understand there are situations where that extra second might mean I get shot in the face. Huge disagreement on the likelihood of those situations actually happening. I don’t live the tactical lifestyle that some people do; the amount of training guys go through so they can effectively use their sidearm to fight their way back to the truck where the REAL guns are, so they can Rambo their way back into taking out the nest of attackers is totally awesome as a hobby, ridiculously useless as practical knowledge for civilians. I can even accept it on philosophical grounds - a well trained militia being the bulwark of safety against an oppressive government. But again, more philosophical than practical.
I’m a landscape architect living in Utah county. My life is not dangerous. I carry a gun 99% because everyone should exercise and respect their rights as Americans to do so, and 1% because I think I might have to use it. Of those scenarios, I’m most concerned about a mass shooting - hardly a Clint Eastwood quickdraw scenario. I have practiced the draw-load-shoot procedure exclusively since I started carrying, so I have no muscle memory of just drawing and clicking a blank trigger.
Ok, so if the glock won’t actually shoot my ‘nads off, why not carry in the pipe JUST TO BE SAFE? Well, I have heard way more stories of kids getting shot accidentally than civilians dying from being 1 second too slow on the draw. With 5 kids in my house, as perfect as I try to be with gun safety, I can’t ignore the greater than zero chance of a kid somehow getting their hands on this gun and pulling the trigger without thinking. The kids old enough to know how to rack the gun are too well trained, I’m not as concerned about them, but little kids scare me. Super small chance? I sure as hell hope so. But it’s not a scenario I can even contemplate. Safer to have no gun? Possibly, but there’s always trade offs. In my view a bullet in the pipe is a net greater risk than not.