TurboMinivan
Still plays with cars
- Location
- Lehi, UT
What is the main differance between Outback and Forester.
This is a bigger question than most realize. Let's begin with the similarities. The 2.5L Forester and 2.5L Outback use the same engine, the same all-wheel drive system, have the same ground clearance, and share an essentially identical automatic transmission. Having said that, they drive surprisingly differently. Differences in suspension tuning, aerodynamics, transmission software programming, and sound insulation make them feel much more distinct than the above facts would lead you to believe.
In nearly every dimension, the Outback is larger. It is longer nose to tail, has a longer wheelbase, has more rear leg room and more cargo volume, is a little wider, and so on. The primary exception is in body height (particularly the glass area), so if your daily attire includes a 10-gallon hat then you'll probably prefer the Forester.
You Jeep guys will scoff, but I must address the off-pavement capability. I already mentioned the Forester has a shorter wheelbase. It also has shorter overhangs (especially on the rear). This makes a lot of people claim the Forester has "better off road capability" than the Outback, and I would agree with them. These differences won't come in to play if you're just driving down a sandy beach, but they would definitely matter if you were driving up, say, Mineral Basin.
Even though Subaru insists these two models don't compete with one another, I see people walk into our store and compare them every day. Which one is better? That depends on the person. There are reasons to like either one over the other, and I'll never push anybody in any specific direction based on my own beliefs. This is why I intend to let Jack spend some time in each one, so he (and his wife) can decide which one best meets their needs.