Hickey said:post a picture of the area it will be covering.
Hickey said:1/8" would prolly be fine, but I would weld some flat bar to it in a few places to help keep the shape.
Yeah, second that. I welded a peice of thin by small rectangle tubing across the front edge of my skid to keep it flat.Hickey said:1/8" would prolly be fine, but I would weld some flat bar to it in a few places to help keep the shape.
?Shawn said:Interesting crossmember..
what?CHAD VANDALL said:
Shawn said:Interesting crossmember..
supergper said:whats interesting about it
Shawn said:I just have not seen a cross member mounter that way. Most I have seen/done have been hard mounted to the frame and the poly was mounted to the trany/t case. I say interesting because it is nifty.
I dig it! Shawn, there was really no room under the HHHUUUUUUUGGGEEE 203/205 combo for a traditional mount, unless we wanted to kill the possibility of a flat skidplate, or raise the t-case up more. This way allowed the T-cases to sit as low as possible, without having anything protrude below the "frame rails".Shawn said:I just have not seen a cross member mounter that way. Most I have seen/done have been hard mounted to the frame and the poly was mounted to the trany/t case. I say interesting because it is nifty.
Hickey said:Personally I would not run that type of crossmember. I have heard of quite a few people cracking tranny cases and/or bellhousings because of the lack of movement at the south end of the drivetrain.
I could kinda see how this might be. There are bushings on the mount, however they are not as thick as stock type ones would be. Maybe adding another soft mount under the t case and trany might help. Just a thin disk.Hickey said:Personally I would not run that type of crossmember. I have heard of quite a few people cracking tranny cases and/or bellhousings because of the lack of movement at the south end of the drivetrain.