My last trip up American Fork Canyon was riding my KLR650 with my good friend on his. These are the ultimate Utah exploration machines and we had a great ride up to Forrest Lake. This gave me the opportunity to watch a non-RMEer, a non-BRCer, and non-U4er, but a great guy who loves the Utah outdoors and, albeit unknowingly, wants trails to stay open. As we made our way around the last right hand curve and up the hill into the clearing that surrounds the lake, we stopped to take in the views. After spotting a fire ring across the lake, we took of in that direction with my friend leading the way. He wanted to follow the shore line and he b-lined it right out onto the flat peninsula that gets covered on high water months. If you're very familiar with this area at all, you know that I'm talking about the area that's off limits to motorized vehicles. I believe the FS is trying to restore plant life as well as keep people from rutting through the mud and destroying the shore line. The brown plastic signs were up and the ones that were left standing when we got there were more or less about 30 feet apart, but they proved easy to miss for my "less aware of the tense land use situation" friend.
I honked at him and waved him to come back and follow me wide and to the right around the lake. As soon as we got settled and broke out the snacks, we got into a discussion about FS practices, the canyon, and land use in general. He's a business minded person and we like to relate things in the context of "if this situation was run like a for-profit business, things would get done differently."
With that, I give you my distillation of our conversation and conclusions:
I'm curious what thoughts you have and especially if you belong to a local club, how you might add to this discussion. As always, those with more experience within the land use realm are encouraged to reply. Please avoid turning this discussion into accusations or a list of problems surrounding off road groups.
I honked at him and waved him to come back and follow me wide and to the right around the lake. As soon as we got settled and broke out the snacks, we got into a discussion about FS practices, the canyon, and land use in general. He's a business minded person and we like to relate things in the context of "if this situation was run like a for-profit business, things would get done differently."
With that, I give you my distillation of our conversation and conclusions:
- The road up to FL is adopted by Utah4x4 and the laminated sign nailed to the FS post indicates that along with some guidelines, etc. On popular days like weekends or holidays, U4X4 could post someone there at the turn off by the river crossing to shake people's hands and ask them if they are aware of the risks, dangers and responsibilities of trail travel. I would call this person the "Trail Host" and they could simply hang out in the shade of their sideXside for a few hours and greet people as they pass. I'm not saying everyday, every holiday, or every weekend, but most travelers to the canyon are repeats so I think random hosting days would work quite well to educate land users.
- Same as above, but park yourself at the lake and welcome visitors and keep an eye on things for a few hours. I believe that most trail violators have some level of ignorance - even if it's just ignorance to the idea that they and their friends have the real power to loose trail privileges for all. Just while we were up there, a couple of families came up on sideXsides and they let one of the teens take a turn driving near the lake. He wasn't roosting through the mud, but he was practicing driving by going back and forth on the correct trail but every time he got to the one end, he would make a small loop into the restricted area to turn around. It could have been a great education opportunity for him and his family if a Host went over and had a chat with his family. Every bit of awareness helps, and don't assume each violation is committed by some beer chugging hooligan.
- Discuss signage with the FS. Yes they are a gov (read: slow and unwieldy) organization but they must be somewhat interested in solutions (I'm assuming). There is a whole science behind human visual cognition - businesses tap into it all the time. I'm not advocating for neon yellow markers dotting the wilderness, but the reality is that the difference between a skinny brown sign that means "welcome all" and the skinny brown sign that means "keep out" is a few square cm of white vinyl. I think something like a red outline vs a green outline... and I don't want to start that whole discussion, but I wanted to start the conversation about some change with marking boundaries.
- Similar to the above comment would be marker placement. When my friend went beyond the boundary, the sign that was closest to him was about 25 feet to the right. In other words, the gap between the signs was too great and the sign was not in the line-of-sight of where leaving the trail occurred. (A little hard to explain in words and without pics so next time I'll take some). While the FS may not be in a position to alter their sign placement procedures, I'm betting they wouldn't mind if U4X4 placed small arrow signs near the ground to help people avoid leaving the trail on those extra sensitive sections.
I'm curious what thoughts you have and especially if you belong to a local club, how you might add to this discussion. As always, those with more experience within the land use realm are encouraged to reply. Please avoid turning this discussion into accusations or a list of problems surrounding off road groups.