If you mix cardio in with weight training you'll get your desired build. Its easier to convert fat into muscle than to lose 10-15 and then try to build it back. That's the problem I have now. After losing my weight I am now trying to build muscle out of nothing.
This statement is factually incorrect and is the biggest load of dog **** spewed in the industry. You can not convert fat into muscle. Its like asking a slice of cheesecake to turn into a T-Bone if you use Splenda instead of sugar.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/matt2.htm
Alright... go ahead... laugh it up. I'll laugh right along with you. For those of you who may not have realized it yet, it is 100% impossible to turn fat into muscle. Actually, the idea of turning fat into muscle is so idiotic that it is very likely to cause people to laugh right in your face if you ask them about it. You shouldn't feel too bad about it though, because like I said earlier, I was just like you. Really... I was.
The anabolic diet needs to be high in calories. Here is two quick answers as to how muscles grow:
The process of muscle growth is not known for sure, but most theories are based on the idea that lifting breaks down the muscle, and growth results from over-compensating to protect the body from future stress. The human body breaks down and rebuilds all of the muscles every 15 to 30 days. Lifting speeds up the process due to an increased need for fuel. Rebuilding peaks 24 to 36 hours after training and continues at increased rates for as much as 72 hours.
The muscle hypoxia theory is that weight training decreases muscle oxygen content, and that triggers protein synthesis. It came from the fact that lifting loads over 60% of maximum temporarily cuts off blood flow. Restricting blood flow with a tourniquet does not result in muscle growth, and pearl divers are not overly muscular, so the muscle hypoxia theory can be thrown out. Another theory is that training increases blood flow and the increased nutrient supply is responsible for growth.
Muscle growth comes about because of hypertrophy or hyperplasia.
Hypertrophy is an increase in the size of the muscle due to an increase in the size of the muscle fibers (size of cells), while hyperplasia is an increase in the number of muscle fibers (cell division).
Hypertrophy comes in two forms, sarcomere hypertrophy, an increase in the size of the contractile portion of the muscle; and sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, an increase in the non-contractile portion of the muscle.
Sarcomere hypertrophy involves a smaller increase in the diameter of the muscle, but muscle density increases. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy shows an increase in muscle diameter and a decrease in density. All hypertrophy will involve both processes; the ratio is dependent on training intensity and frequency.
Heavy training on a regular basis will make you feel solid whereas someone who trains for the pump with light weights will feel soft. If you are interested in improving performance, than strive for sarcomere hypertrophy. Sarcoplasmic hypertrophy is only beneficial if an increase in body weight is more important than an improvement in performance.
More here:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/issa7.htm
People, please look at this like you do your Rock Crawling habit. You cant convert your D30 into a Dynatrac Pro Rock Dana 60 by simpley changing the quality of lube you put in to it. If someone told you this, wouldnt you look into it further? The information is out there and if you are serious about weight loss or gaining lean mass I challenge you to look for it. However keep in mind you can not "Build lean mass" and "Lose significant fat" by going on a diet.
(Not pointing the finger at you Kramnden, I am just saying this as a whole).