Tire Carrier Sheared OFF!

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
I have a rear bumper (Fabbed by AFW in Montana) that recently had the tralier axle shear off on the highway. After studying the failure it looks like there was a small fatigue crack that propogated into a large split and finally the catastrophic failure.

I have seen this failure on other boards and it looks like it is starting to happen to more people. Luckily, the latch system (large 3/4 bolt with T handle) held the thing from actually bouncing down the highway and killing someoone!

I will try and post some pictures, but I would advise all of you to take a look at the motion you get in your carrier. If there is any motion, you WILL start a fatigue crack, its only a matter of time. Those trailer axles that everyone uses are so brittle there is no resistance to fatigue!

So its off to the drawing board, and I am trying to think outside the box. First of all double shear will help, second - a higher, pivot or attachement method (as EZ and others have mentioned) would for sure help. Is the high screwdown method enough?

I have a new design I would like to get some comments on. I have posted a picture of the solid model. Take some box tube cut one side off and and cut a 1 1/2 hole in the ends.Weld a huge 1 1/2 -6 Grade 8 Nut and cut a clearance hole for the nut in the top of the bumper. Now weld the box tube all around the base for a very large footprint weld for stability. Now take the arm tube and machine some shoulders (or just the ID) for some high capacity bronze bushings. Slip a huge 1 1/2 -6 Partially threaded Grade 8 Bolt through the top of the channel, the arm and bushings and into the welded nut.




The grade 8 bolt has a huge double shear strength and unlike the trailer axle that has been surface hardened to the brittle point and is less resistant to fatigue than a grade 8 bolt.

http://www.rockcrawler.com/techreports/fasteners/index.asp
Toughness is an important feature of a fastener. It is the opposite of brittleness and gives you an idea of how it will handle abuse without being damaged and eventually weakening the fastener or can cause fatigue to appear much earlier than normal. One way to “measure” toughness is by looking at the hardness rating of a fastener. The higher the number (Brinell, Rockwell …) the harder the material is and the tougher it is to damage. According to Marks’ Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Grade 5’s typically have a core Rockwell hardness of C25-C34 whereas a grade 8 typically has a core Rockwell hardness of C33-C39. Based on this, grade 8’s are tougher than grade 5’s.


Now you have a simple, cheap, double shear system that you can actaully replace the bolt either on the trail in event of failure or at some regular maintence interval every year or two.

You can do the bolt for ~$10
Nut for ~$5
two bushings for ~$13ea
and the Box tube ~$15
 

Attachments

  • Inside.jpg
    Inside.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 18
  • outside.jpg
    outside.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:

benjy

Rarely wrenches
Supporting Member
Location
Moab
thats what you get for trusting those dang montanans....

I am excited to see how this turns out!
 

James K

NO, I'm always like this
Location
Taylorsville, Ut
sjbrownie4x4 said:
One more overall pic showing bumper and possible gussett
this is the design I would do. it will spread the load out farther.

when I had a swing out carrier, I used bearing that had a shoulder on them that fit in a piece of 2" x .120 wall tube and ran a 3/4" bolt through them with a "T" handle welded to the bolt. Never had a problem and I did it in single shear. I also ran a couple rods with 1/2" heims on each end from the carrier to the cage and used 1/2" hitch pins to secure them. Made for a soild mount with next to no movement.
 

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
Sorry for the quality, my camera phone is really poor after all.....
 

Attachments

  • Photo_052306_001.jpg
    Photo_052306_001.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 35
  • Photo_052306_002.jpg
    Photo_052306_002.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 46

1993yj

.
Location
Salt Lake
I have a rear bumper and carrier from Durango. Dont know how they do it now, but mine actually has a brace that goes to the body, and then in the body it ties into the frame. I also made a pin that ties the back of the tire carrier itself into my tailgate to give it added strength and keep it from swaying as I am trying to bump up obstacles. Also, instead of just rubber or poly bushings, I had some nylon machined to the sizes I wanted. My poly bushings kept breaking down in a year or two. Have been running the nylon for 6 years now, and still no sway.

Also, someone once told me that a grade 5 bolt actully has a higher shear strength than a grade 8. Anyone know the validity to this?
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
1993yj said:
..Also, someone once told me that a grade 5 bolt actully has a higher shear strength than a grade 8. Anyone know the validity to this?

I wrote an essay one day (here on RME? or another forum :confused: ) comparing the strength characteristics of two... I have a strengths book that disects the two with a fine tooth comb. I'll try and dig up the writing...
 

Brad

The artist formerly known as Redrock5.9
Location
Highland
I don't get how you DIDN'T see this coming? Single shear and a small trailer bearing like that, I wouldn't have run that thing from the beginning. Even mine leave me a bit uneasy and gets checked often for stress cracks. New design looks good BTW.
 

Attachments

  • tr_carrier.jpg
    tr_carrier.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 33

DevinB

I like traffic lights
Location
Down Or'm
sjbrownie4x4 said:
One more overall pic showing bumper and possible gussett


I don't see the purpose of this gussett. The forces we're dealing with aren't along the axis that this gussett supports, they're 90 degrees from it. Does that make sense?
 

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
You're right, The real direction to gussett would be at 90 degrees. In most bumpers I think that would be impractical. Generally to the front (of the bumper) you would just have air and to the rear you would have the body.

The gussett serves some what as an anti bending help to to the open edge of the box tube. Sure it puts the gussett in bending, which isn't ideal. I also plan to weld a plate that will close in the back side, (shown in the picture below not in the previous ones) and perhaps that alone will be enough stiffness and the gussett will be unnecessary.
 

Attachments

  • backplate.jpg
    backplate.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 12

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
You're right, The real direction to gussett would be at 90 degrees. In most bumpers I think that would be impractical. Generally to the front you would just have air and to the rear you would have the body.

The gussett serves some what as an anti bending help to to the open edge of the box tube. Sure it puts the gussett in bending, which isn't ideal. I also plan to weld a plate that will close in the back side, (not shown in the picture) and perhaps that alone will be enough stiffness and the gussett will be unnecessary.
 

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
It is the standard trailer bearing size that almost everyone is selling. I think people used to think they were great for the carrier, and now they are begining to fail. You could go up one size to the 3500# axle (1750# one side) and that would help the problem just because of the shear amount of metal you throw at the problem. That approach does not, get to the real root of the problem: that the tralier bearing is designed to transfer the load to a very concentric piece (wheel) running right in line with it. It is not well designed to deal with a bending moment and vibration load 3+ feet away

I have drawn a simple sketch how a tralier axle bearing is normally loaded.
 

Attachments

  • reactions.jpg
    reactions.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 19

sjbrownie4x4

Active Member
Location
SLC, UT
Here is the expected forces in the tralier bearing as designed and as we are using them.
 

Attachments

  • CarrierReactions.jpg
    CarrierReactions.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 18

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
sjbrownie4x4 said:
...Solidworks. I am a mechanical engineer and I use it almost every day on the job. I may do a quick Fatigue FEA if a get some time....

Nice a fellow nerd... I knew you were talking my language! :cool:
 

Brad

The artist formerly known as Redrock5.9
Location
Highland
sjbrownie4x4 said:
the tralier bearing is designed to transfer the load to a very concentric piece (wheel) running right in line with it. It is not well designed to deal with a bending moment and vibration load 3+ feet away

Thanks for the drawings but they are unnecessary, I'm well aware of what trailer bearings are and are not designed for (EE but working on ME for double major). Nevertheless that design is destined to fail and I would never have left the shop with that. IMO, single shear should be avoided whenever possible. Hope you didn't pay too much for that fab work or bumper design. I do like the new design, and if I were to do it all over I'd probably go with something so easily serviceable as that over a unit bearing.
 
Top