Utah Lift Law

PSD_FTW

Member
So I was reading on the Utah Highway Patrol website that Maximum Legal lift in Utah is 4" Mechanical and 4" Tire -- But then it sites Title 41-6-148.32 UCA which is the same law the Safety Inspection Manual sites. Of course the Inspection Manual only Mentions this law and nothing about four inches. What’s the highway patrol trying to pull here? If this is the law regarding lift I could lift my truck like 12 inches. I certainly see plenty of trucks driving around which are obviously lifted more than four inches and there's nothing in the Inspection manual about it.

This is kind of a relief because one way or the other it's going to cost me 800-1000+ to lift - I'd rather it be 6-8" than four unless someone can weigh in with another law on the books.

41-6a-1631. Prohibitions.
(1) A person may not operate on a highway a motor vehicle that is mechanically altered or changed:
(a) in any way that may under normal operation:
(i) cause the motor vehicle body or chassis to come in contact with the roadway;
(ii) expose the fuel tank to damage from collision; or
(iii) cause the wheels to come in contact with the body;
(b) in any manner that may impair the safe operation of the vehicle;
(c) so that any part of the vehicle other than tires, rims, and mudguards are less than three inches above the ground;
(d) to a frame height of more than 24 inches for a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 4,500 pounds;
(e) to a frame height of more than 26 inches for a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of at least 4,500 pounds and less than 7,500 pounds;
(f) to a frame height of more than 28 inches for a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of at least 7,500 pounds;
(g) by stacking or attaching vehicle frames (one from on top of or beneath another frame); or
(h) so that the lowest portion of the body floor is raised more than three inches above the top of the frame.
(2) If the wheel track is increased beyond the O.E.M. specification, the top 50% of the tires shall be covered by the original fenders, by rubber, or other flexible fender extenders under any loading condition.
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
The 4" & 4" wheelbase relative law is the OLD law... the 24", 26", and 28" frame height is the new law (kudos U4WDA). Not sure why the UHP would even list the old law on their site, but then again, they attempt to enforce their own laws ;)
 

jdub

Scrambler
Location
Provo, Utah.
The last one? I don't understand the meaning. In Utah County I've been told that there should be no tires sticking out, at all. I want to keep my rig in line with the law so there's no headache each year but honestly I drive an off road vehicle not a Geo Metro. I made some flexible fenders out of cardstock just cause I thought it was dumb and it passed. Others told me it had to be the same material as the original fenders??? I'm not trying to cause problems these issues are over a few inches of tread.
 

SAMI

Formerly Beardy McGee
Location
SLC, UT
Close... You need fender flares and flaps to cover 50%. If you have just the flaps, you should be able to get away with it though.

i've always heard that top of the tire has to be 100% covered(fender flares)... and the back of the tire has to be 50% covered(mudflaps).

-Jason
 

BCGPER

Starting Another Thread
Location
Sunny Arizona
Ok, 100% coverage down to the centerline of the axle. Is that clearer? Kinda hard to explain, as you can tell by reading the law.



i've always heard that top of the tire has to be 100% covered(fender flares)... and the back of the tire has to be 50% covered(mudflaps).

-Jason
 
Top