We should have WAY more sway to convince our state legislators than the feds. All the issues with state government exists with Federal but with the issue of being way to far removed.
We should have WAY more sway to convince our state legislators than the feds. All the issues with state government exists with Federal but with the issue of being way to far removed.
Or voting boundaries, or marijuana laws, or...Try that logic on a LCC Gondola![]()
I know, I know BUT we do have medical marijuana and we don't have a gondola so maybe it's kinda working?Or voting boundaries, or marijuana laws, or...
DAA's right. They wouldn't BE public, anymore.those of us who want to be able to continue to drive on dirt roads on public land.
I just don't see the state taking on actual administration of public land. Where would that money come from? It wouldn't be trivial.
I think it would be all about making money off that land. Not spending money to keep it public.
I have zero confidence in our state government to do anything except make as much money as possible from it. This state has always followed the Golden Rule. Which is he who has the gold makes the rules.
- DAA
DAA's right. They wouldn't BE public, anymore.
The state's PR machine is talking a big game about reopening roads and whatnot, but that's all smoke and mirrors. Plenty of them have said the quiet part out loud - the state wants money. Public lands don't make money. The state will either restrict access and charge admission, or sell it off to private owners (who will restrict access).