Originally posted by TigerStripe40
Hmm. That's interesting, because, when I have wheeled with trucks running SBC's they usually have to rev their rpms up to get over stuff I simply idle over. If a SBC had more low end torque, they wouldn't have to rev their motors.
It's true that a SBC CAN produce more torque than an I6, but only in the upper RPM range of their power bands.
I6's have a VERY flat power curve, which means that you get most of your power available at idle. V8's on the other hand have a VERY CURVED power curve (ie Bellcurve). They don't make much power at idle speeds. In fact they make VERY LITTLE, you need to rev them for them to make more power. This is an inherant design in the V configuration of the cylinders. An Inline8 would be a torque MONSTER.
Keep telling yourself that. It sounds just like what I told myself when I ran a I6. The fact is if you look at a dyno graph a mild V8 will probably have higher torque figures at all RPMs. They also are able to idle at a lower RPM and smoother because of the additional two cylinders firing. Of course it is easy to build a V8 that will not idle and that will only make power up in the band but the same thing could be done to a I6. I don't have anything against I6s I thought the Jeep 258 was pretty good ecept for the carb and I don't think you could ever kill the 300ci 6 in my old Ford truck but after having both 6 and 8 cylenders in my Jeep the V8 wins in every catagory off idle, mid range and at high revs.