Is defaulting on an oral agreement a "Freedom of Speech"? He agreed to purchase something at a price he offered and has/had no intentions of paying for it, its fraud. If your willing to defend his actions, would you defend mine when I make an oral agreement with the sole intention of defaulting on said agreement, premeditated fraud? Under oath in court, agreeing to return a test-drive car, making a false statement to a LEO. Has "Freedom of Speech" become such a stronghold that we let it over rule fundamental honesty?
Make no mistake I don't doubt for a minute that there is a legal standard for fighting such agreements, then again make no mistake there is a reason some in the legal community give the others a bad rap
I think he should be on the hook for the millions of dollars he defrauded from TAXPAYERS!!! The BLM already dropped 2/3's of the leases in that area, as always a compromise is never enough and the found a less ethical way to resolve the issue.