Chrysler backs down, agrees to recall 1.56 million older-model Jeeps

TurboMinivan

Still plays with cars
Location
Lehi, UT
NEWSFLASH: if your vehicle is stopped and you get rear-ended by someone going 50+ MPH, your fuel tank might rupture.

Stupid government safety asshats. :mad:
 

jeeper

I live my life 1 dumpster at a time
Location
So Jo, Ut
I have never been concerned with being rear ended in our jeep.. However, I have drug the tank on a rock or two :D
 

Kiel

Formerly WJ ZUK
All they do is slap on a hitch. Big deal, I bet most don't go in at all. I laugh at the people posting saying you can get a cheaper deal by showing people selling the recall. Idiots
 

jeep-N-montero

Formerly black_ZJ
Location
Bountiful
All they do is slap on a hitch. Big deal, I bet most don't go in at all. I laugh at the people posting saying you can get a cheaper deal by showing people selling the recall. Idiots

Especially when the dealer/mfr is paying for the repairs. My Jeeps have several outstanding recalls that I don't really care about.
 

TurboMinivan

Still plays with cars
Location
Lehi, UT
Uh, I don't consider getting rear-ended at 50+ a slow speed accident as the recall states.

In their press release, Chrysler mentioned that the hitch install would "better manage crash forces in low-speed impacts," not NHTSA.

My comment was aimed at the web sites and alarmists who have been pushing for this recall. For example, there is a well-known web petition which was trying to get the government to force Chrysler to recall the Jeeps. The gal who started the petition was on scene when there was a rear-end crash and resulting fire that killed two people. She does a wonderful job of painting a picture of the horrific scene, and she goes on and on about how unsafe the Jeep is. What she conveniently forgot to mention on her petition web site--but she was able to tell police and reporters at the scene--is that the Jeep was at a stand still in an interstate traffic jam when it was rear-ended by a semi truck traveling at full speed. That was hardly a low-speed parking lot mishap, now, was it?

Depending who you believe, somewhere between 51 and 287 people have died in crashes involving fire while riding in a 1993-2004 Grand Cherokee. Jeep built over 1,428,000 ZJs alone; I don't know how many WJs they built. But even if we ignore the WJs, use the highest death figure of 287 and say all the deaths occurred in a ZJ, that means the number of "deadly" Grand Cherokees constitute a pretty damn small figure: about one five thousandth of the total production.

Long story short, there is no safety defect here. Chrysler got railroaded into this. Yes, I am a Jeep fan. Nevertheless, I would be every bit as vocal about it if it were happening to any other company. It is complete, utter horse crap.
 
Last edited:

jeep-N-montero

Formerly black_ZJ
Location
Bountiful
In their press release, Chrysler mentioned that the hitch install would "better manage crash forces in low-speed impacts," not NHTSA.

My comment was aimed at the web sites and alarmists who have been pushing for this recall. For example, there is a well-known web petition which was trying to get the government to force Chrysler to recall the Jeeps. The gal who started the petition was on scene when there was a rear-end crash and resulting fire that killed two people. She does a wonderful job of painting a picture of the horrific scene, and she goes on and on about how unsafe the Jeep is. What she conveniently forgot to mention on her petition web site--but she was able to tell police and reporters at the scene--is that the Jeep was at a stand still in an interstate traffic jam when it was rear-ended by a semi truck traveling at full speed. That was hardly a low-speed parking lot mishap, now, was it?

Depending who you believe, somewhere between 51 and 287 people have died in crashes involving fire while riding in a 1993-2004 Grand Cherokee. Jeep built over 1,428,000 ZJs alone; I don't know how many WJs they built. But even if we ignore the WJs, use the highest death figure of 287 and say all the deaths occurred in a ZJ, that means the number of "deadly" Grand Cherokees constitute a pretty damn small figure: about one five thousandth of the total production.

Long story short, there is no safety defect here. Chrysler got railroaded into this. Yes, I am a Jeep fan. Nevertheless, I would be every bit as vocal about it if it were happening to any other company. It is complete, utter horse crap.

I couldn't agree more, especially on cars over 10 years old.
 

dash

Active Member
Location
lehi
I am in agreement with Turbominivan. If the problem was as the video on the link suggests that since the gas tank is behind the rear axle it is a hazard. How many different vehicles have the same design? Sadly, i still think this is a way for a someone to flex his/her muscle. Nothing more. Beware "they" will get you if you don't play "their" game.
 

Marsh99

Lover of all things Toyota
Location
Mantua UT
I think this is the difference between Toyota and Chrysler; Toyota Tacoma is prone to a rusty frame Toyota offers new frames to people. Jeeps light on fire, Chrysler says not our fault. :D Toyota Winning!
 

TurboMinivan

Still plays with cars
Location
Lehi, UT
I think this is the difference between Toyota and Chrysler; Toyota Tacoma is prone to a rusty frame Toyota offers new frames to people. Jeeps light on fire, Chrysler says not our fault. :D Toyota Winning!

Maybe Chrysler can send every ZJ owner a coupon for a free pack of Ballpark hot dogs.
 
Top