Mexican State Bans Junk Food Sales to Children - that would NEVER fly here but it's a step that would help immediately.
I disagree. I think we are one more mask mandate away from embracing something like this with open arms. "Think of the children!!!"
Also, similar things are already in effect:
What snacks and drinks can we legally stock in school vending machines now. Learn how to keep up with new USDA rules and regulations.
discountvending.com
However, I agree that banning junk food sales to children would help with childhood obesity. I also agree that hiding in your house will slow the spread of pretty much any virus. I also think that if you don't ever use the internet you decrease the likelihood of getting hacked. I also think that putting steel bars on all your windows and welding your doors shut will make your house less likely to get broken into. I also think that if every household had daily social worker visits it would decrease child abuse. I also think that if cars were banned there would be less pollution and less traffic fatalities. And on and on.
But I don't do/advocate any of those things. Because what I DON'T agree with is the government telling us how to live our lives. And don't start with the drunk driving analogy. The roads are built by the government and their use is regulated. I get that there are differences between a free society and Anarchy. But there are also differences between a free society and a Dictatorship/Totalitarianism, and I would argue that - with the exception of the current disregard to our laws that is happening in certain areas of the country - the laws in this country are significantly closer to Dictatorship/Totalitarianism than they are to Anarchy. I believe that the government should do the very least interfering possible in peoples' lives, while still maintaining the purposes for which it was founded. If I own a business and I decide I don't want to sell my product to an individual, I should be able to. If a restaurant owner wants to have a dirty dining room with rodents and insects all over, while serving under-cooked food, there should be no health department to tell them they can't. I won't be eating there, but that should be my choice. If my neighbors one town over decide they all want to follow a man they believe to be a prophet and participate in relationships that don't follow my beliefs, they should be able to. It's THEIR CHOICE! I my not agree, so I don't have to participate. That's MY CHOICE! If someone wants to swing from an arch it should be their choice, even if one of them happens to miscalculate and ends up dead. We still need to be allowed to choose. That's why we formed the government in the first place, to protect our right to choose! Not to protect us FROM our right to choose! And certainly not to protect us from the consequences of our choices. If I decide to spend all my money now and not save anything for retirement, I shouldn't have the government stealing from the general population to make sure I can retire!
The government was founded to protect our right to choose, not to protect us FROM our right to choose and it CERTAINLY wasn't founded to take away that right.
*After I wrote this I realized it could come across as directed at UT410 because I quoted his post. It is not directed at anyone in particular but generally directed towards those who believe that government mandates are the answer to _________________________.*