So Pokey,
I'm very flattered that you'd put me in that category, but I think I'm more of a 'middle' dawg. I think that your definition could be described by those that think the trail that causes so much controversy {Rattlesnake--and I don't want to get that involved in this discussion at all} is basicly a nice 'test area' for their rigs changes.
If that trail is a 'milk-run' and your rig doesn't break a sweat doing it, you'd be a 'big dawg'? Correct?
We could add a lot of names to that list, but I kind of like the idea of not naming people.
My comments:
I also like the attitude comment from BlackSheep. I barely got to work on my rig when it broke, 'cause two 'big dawgs' were in the way {thanks again, guys, you know who you are}. That's off-roading, IMHO. A group of dudes/dudettes that know the capabilities of their rig, and push it to it's outer limits. There's also a 'sense' of ownership of the group that goes with the 'dawgs'.
I've ran with guys that have been Jeeping for 20+ years and just put 'new, big' 33" tires on their -5's, and they can climb stuff in that little simple rig that make any of us sweat. I'd count them as 'big dawgs' also.
UROC (or other) competitors: After a few comps, I think you are a 'dawg' if you are at all competitive (not pointing out on EVERY obstacle). That's some funky stuff that gets done there, and most rigs go home in one piece. Hat's off dudes (not for long, as I'll get a sunburn)
Edit: I just read SRN's post below and he has a very valid point. Guys that have contributed to the 'sport' for a long time, expecting nothing in return except what they get on the trail. I don't know many of the RR4W members, but it cannot be denied that they have contributed (some members more than others, I'm sure) to the growth of the sport in and around Moab. ANY that I've ran across on the trail have been exceptional Jeepers and fun (some in their own way) to have on a trail ride.