I think the only, and subtle difference in steve's perspective is that as evolved beings fishing is not for survival even if the fish is consumed, it isn't necessary to survive due to other available food sources.
on a pure survival standpoint, the cost, and effort spent on going out on fishing, could easily net (pun intended) a human being more food if spent on acquiring food in other ways
I do agree, humane killing practices should always be used. but I think since steve is already all up in his head about his perspective, he should avoid looking at it from a survival standpoint because his human brain (which is capable of reasoning/logic) would see the point I listed above, and render any perspective changes based on "survival" moot. and therefore not helping him
on a pure survival standpoint, the cost, and effort spent on going out on fishing, could easily net (pun intended) a human being more food if spent on acquiring food in other ways
I do agree, humane killing practices should always be used. but I think since steve is already all up in his head about his perspective, he should avoid looking at it from a survival standpoint because his human brain (which is capable of reasoning/logic) would see the point I listed above, and render any perspective changes based on "survival" moot. and therefore not helping him