- Location
- Bountiful, land of rocks
More land use issues--- this time by our state gov
- Thread starter mbryson
- Start date
- Location
- Sandy, Ut
- Location
- Grantsville, Utah
Done! Easy peasy
- Location
- Grand Junction, CO
Done, took no time at all to send the letter.
- Location
- West Haven, UT
Done, super easy
- Location
- Bountiful, land of rocks
- Location
- Never Far From Nowhere
Done.
- Location
- Eagle Mountain, Utah
Done
ID Bronco
Registered User
- Location
- Idaho Falls, ID
Out of staters probably shouldn't have any pull , but I did it anyway.
Westernhunter
Active Member
DONE!
Thank you for reaching out and voicing your position on this bill. After hearing SB67 this evening in the House Transportation Committee, I supported holding the bill because of the questions that were raised. I will keep your concerns in mind as the bill comes up for further consideration.
Sincerely,
Representative Susan Pulsipher
Utah House of Representatives
District 45
Sincerely,
Representative Susan Pulsipher
Utah House of Representatives
District 45
- Location
- Sandy, Ut
You can watch the hearing here:
The bill got stalled in committee over Class D roads being excluded from protection if they crossed private lands and have not been used.
The bill got stalled in committee over Class D roads being excluded from protection if they crossed private lands and have not been used.
- Location
- Stinkwater
Relevant bits:
I'm a proponent of open travel. I believe that as long as the traveller isn't infringing on the property owners rights (leaving trash, damaging property, etc) all land should be open to travel and the property owner should need to provide a clear and compelling reason otherwise (and "I'm a selfish jerk that doesn't want you travelling on 'my' property" doesn't cut it). We don't have the legal principle of allemansrätten here in the US and these class D roads are about as close as we get. We all cross private property on rarely used class D roads all the time, and this loss would be devastating. This legislation is terrible.
I'm a proponent of open travel. I believe that as long as the traveller isn't infringing on the property owners rights (leaving trash, damaging property, etc) all land should be open to travel and the property owner should need to provide a clear and compelling reason otherwise (and "I'm a selfish jerk that doesn't want you travelling on 'my' property" doesn't cut it). We don't have the legal principle of allemansrätten here in the US and these class D roads are about as close as we get. We all cross private property on rarely used class D roads all the time, and this loss would be devastating. This legislation is terrible.
Thank you for your email and sharing your concerns with me. I appreciate you and your engagement in the legislative process.
SB 67 was assigned to the House Transportation committee which I’m not part of. I believe this bill was held by this committee. If SB 67 is recommended by this committee, we will hear it during the House floor meetings. I will keep you in thoughts if this bill gets to the House floor.
Feel free to reach out if you have any additional questions or concerns. Your input is important, and I am here to address any further inquiries you may have.
Sincerely,
Jordan
SB 67 was assigned to the House Transportation committee which I’m not part of. I believe this bill was held by this committee. If SB 67 is recommended by this committee, we will hear it during the House floor meetings. I will keep you in thoughts if this bill gets to the House floor.
Feel free to reach out if you have any additional questions or concerns. Your input is important, and I am here to address any further inquiries you may have.
Sincerely,
Jordan