new post on the UROC board

billforce

Registered User
I just seen this on the UROC board and had to reply. I think that some of the local team should reply. Either for the wall your not. I think the sport need them what do you guys think. maybe some fans can give there input to.



I will probably add my $.02 later but I think we view it as a safety and vehicle maintenance concern. Some ideas have been propsed to make things more favorable.

I will start with what I added over there:

As far as I am concerned, the rules are a contract between the promoter and the competitor. That means the promoter (in this case UROC) needs to hold thier end of the deal. We are rockcrawling here folks. UROC should not drop back up points and make "penalty free" zones to encourage teams to repeatidly hit death climbs and smash up thier rigs. This is NOT an exhibition.[/quote]




From what I have read in the UROC 2004 rules on page 2 of 12 of the safety rules .

# 5 That the driver or any other person (s) in a vehicle participating in any UROC event may chose to bypass any obstacle and, therefore, assumes all risk and liability, as indicated.


# 2 on the same page That he or she has at all time, while riding in a vehicle participating in an event, wear his or her respective seat and shoulder belt and helmet.



Now is it up to UROC to look and see if we are wearing are seat belts right? I don't think so, they have made the rules and we the teams should fellow them for are own safety don’t, you guys think? I watch NASCAR almost every weekend and when the drive get into his car, he put is belt on and then a crew member come and make sure that they are done up right. So if it is up to the drivers of NASCAR why don’t we do the same in are sport? it is for are safety! and if we don't fellow the safety rules then UROC should hand down point


For the death climbs you are talking about . Like the rule says you don't have to do any course you don't like our fill safe doing. So how can any team put this on UROC back? We all got into a extreme sport and that is what it is coming to, I hope for the fans it gets harder and the show get better. Look at Motor cross racing 10 years ago, it was on the TV all most every weekend now all you see is free style motor cross and they are make a lot of money doing what some said was impossible to do, and are getting hurt and crash there bikes.

If we all look at these climbs as a death climb then are sport will just stay a small sport with promoters going broke and no fan turn out and yes many team will go broke right a long with some promoter to but that has been happening in racing for a long time. Yes we as team spend a lot of are money fix are rig after every event but that is just like any other racing sport out there. We totaled are rig at the last PRO event in UT it was not UROC that did it, your the course. We knew what could happen if we tried it and it did. Know we have come back to the shop and are building a new rig for those type of courses, because when it come down to it that is what the fan want to see. Time are changing in are sport and I hope for the best. Some of you guys and ladies are going to think that I am **** up for posting this but I have been in the sport for more than four years and other off-road sport for another eight years.


there will be a death in are sport some day soon and I am sorry to say that because many of you guys and ladies are my good friends, but look at any other motor sport our extreme sport, there as been many death. For UROC you need to make the safety rules for the type of course you are making use to run a handown the point to everyone that doesn't fellow them right. For are rig we are going to have to build better rig to take the crash. Maybe UROC should look at some chassis and mandate how they are to be built for these type of course’s.


Just my two cents


Man this maybe the first time I have should up for UROC



Wild Bill
team 38
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
Bill,
UROC is evolving Rock Crawling into something that is not Rock Crawling for the sake of drawing fans and publicity. I understand why I just don’t think they have the recourses to make it safe for the competitors by standardizing the vehicles like the other motor sports. I also do not believe any competitor has the ability to build a vehicle safe enough to withstand these types of obstacles and the G-forces encountered when tumbling off a 30 foot wall to totally protect the driver.
Look at the rigs now as compared to a few years ago. Why on earth would you need 500 horses to drive a 2600# vehicle to Rock Crawl? It all used to be about finesse, now we have to defy physics by launching our vehicles up a vertical wall.
No other promoters are building “Death Climbs” and for this reason Linda and I will not compete in UROC next year. We have chosen to Rock Crawl.
Todd
UROC team 303
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
There was only ONE climb at the Portland, IN event that was not crawable IMHO... And guys like Dean Bulloch proved that point. People hopping on the bandwagon calling it a death climb should realize that there was ONE BONUS climb that only 4 guys made it up, most didn't give it an effort...

The fact still remains... the accident on the "Death Climb" would NEVER have happened if his harness was used correctly...

Where else is there "Death Climbs"???

SLC? The Matterhorn is cake, Carl did it in 3WD... sure it was intimidating for the first competitors, but now it is nothing...

Phenoix? The climb there is easier than the Matterhorn, in fact Carl let Creighton take it up, not a problem...

St George? Complete legit courses, nothing dangerous IMHO

Portland? Already talked about that one... It was basically a "Moneypit" competitors whaled on it regardless of how many points they wanted.

The fact is, drivers actually have fun with climbs, I know Carl and I had a great time on the Matterhorn, Phenoix and the Portland climb... now if we would have rolled, not had harness's tight and about killed people, sure we would point fingers... :rolleyes:
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
cruiseroutfit said:
There was only ONE climb at the Portland, IN event that was not crawable IMHO... And guys like Dean Bulloch proved that point. People hopping on the bandwagon calling it a death climb should realize that there was ONE BONUS climb that only 4 guys made it up, most didn't give it an effort...

The fact still remains... the accident on the "Death Climb" would NEVER have happened if his harness was used correctly...

Where else is there "Death Climbs"???

SLC? The Matterhorn is cake, Carl did it in 3WD... sure it was intimidating for the first competitors, but now it is nothing...

Phenoix? The climb there is easier than the Matterhorn, in fact Carl let Creighton take it up, not a problem...

St George? Complete legit courses, nothing dangerous IMHO

Portland? Already talked about that one... It was basically a "Moneypit" competitors whaled on it regardless of how many points they wanted.

The fact is, drivers actually have fun with climbs, I know Carl and I had a great time on the Matterhorn, Phenoix and the Portland climb... now if we would have rolled, not had harness's tight and about killed people, sure we would point fingers... :rolleyes:
The point is, this is a trend and is just the evolution of the sport. What is next? The only way to win is to make it up these walls. It sometimes only takes one course to determine the winner and you have to build a rig capable of doing these. All I am saying is that the evolution is towards something that is not Rock Crawling and that it is not the direction Linda and I want to follow.
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
cruiseroutfit said:
SLC? The Matterhorn is cake, Carl did it in 3WD... sure it was intimidating for the first competitors, but now it is nothing...QUOTE]

Come on Kurt. Linda was not the only one that rolled off the Matterhorn out of the Extreme Series. I know most of the pros made it but all the drivers that I saw make it were shaking afterwards so yes it is something. Try it in your LC! This was not Rock Crawling.
 

billforce

Registered User
Todd Adams said:
Bill,
UROC is evolving Rock Crawling into something that is not Rock Crawling for the sake of drawing fans and publicity. I understand why I just don’t think they have the recourses to make it safe for the competitors by standardizing the vehicles like the other motor sports. I also do not believe any competitor has the ability to build a vehicle safe enough to withstand these types of obstacles and the G-forces encountered when tumbling off a 30 foot wall to totally protect the driver.
Look at the rigs now as compared to a few years ago. Why on earth would you need 500 horses to drive a 2600# vehicle to Rock Crawl? It all used to be about finesse, now we have to defy physics by launching our vehicles up a vertical wall.
No other promoters are building “Death Climbs” and for this reason Linda and I will not compete in UROC next year. We have chosen to Rock Crawl.
Todd
UROC team 303

Sorry you guys are moving out of the sport I love watching you guy run. For building rig that can take the rolls. Yes it can be done I have roll at over 100 in offroad racing and finsh the race. Maybe the moon buggys are not for the walls and some should look at that before building new cars.


Wild Bill
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
billforce said:
Sorry you guys are moving out of the sport I love watching you guy run. For building rig that can take the rolls. Yes it can be done I have roll at over 100 in offroad racing and finsh the race. Maybe the moon buggys are not for the walls and some should look at that before building new cars.


Wild Bill

Bill, we are not quitting the sport just UROC. Our first event was Pro Rock and we can compete in Stock Class there as well as WERock.
Todd
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
Todd Adams said:
Come on Kurt. Linda was not the only one that rolled off the Matterhorn out of the Extreme Series. I know most of the pros made it but all the drivers that I saw make it were shaking afterwards so yes it is something. Try it in your LC! This was not Rock Crawling.

I didn't build my Landcruiser to compete... but if I did, I would do it, like I said, after that first attempt, they don't seem bad at all...

That was last years obstacle... each event since they have actually gotten easier... Phenoix could be crawled, Portland was easy IMHO, and St George had litte or no climbs (none that were remotely scary). I stand by my words...

And Carl put it best, fans (ie. money & sponsors) like the climbs, they look alot more exciting then they really are. In Portland, there was constantly a crowd at the climb obstacle (the one with the BONUS on the end), even though the other obstacles were FAR more technical and FAR more challenging IMHO.
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
billforce said:
...Maybe the moon buggys are not for the walls and some should look at that before building new cars...

I agree...

However, Bob Standages rig was NOT that badly damaged, in fact the cage surrounding the driver showed little or no damage from the roll. He did break a wheel and coilover mount as result of his rig crashing into another rig...

I have seen rigs more badly damaged in comps long ago (rember Skinnys rig in St George) they had to cut the top of his rig after a roll... Injuries are nothing new...
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
cruiseroutfit said:
I didn't build my Landcruiser to compete... but if I did, I would do it, like I said, after that first attempt, they don't seem bad at all...QUOTE]
The problem I have is that you said it was "nothing" I never said it was not getting easier for competitors but it is still something! And it would be something to you if you tried it in your LC so don't brag like you have or that it would not be a big deal to try it in any rig.

I talked to several drivers after the first time they made it and they said the same thing, ”It scared the crap out of me”

One of the reasons accidents happen is that we get complacent about certain things. Bob was complacent about not having his harness tight because nothing up to the point of the incident that has created all of this banter had him to the point he thought it needed to be tight. So if you say the Matterhorn is nothing, I believe you are being complacent among other things about it. Don’t ever be. Besides it seems like you are talking for Carl. After all he is the driver not you. All the spotter can do on these types of obstacles is just watch.

So Carl or any other driver, is the Matterhorn nothing like Kurt is saying?

Todd
 
Last edited:

I Lean

Mbryson's hairdresser
Vendor
Location
Utah
Todd Adams said:
So Carl or any other driver, is the Matterhorn nothing like Kurt is saying?

Todd

It's still scary, not gonna lie to ya. BUT, the difficulty of the obstacle is nowhere near what we thought it was going to be when we first saw it, or even during/after Supercrawl. That shows in the percentages of rigs we've seen make it up 'n over. At SCIII, it was probably less than 50%. At both of the events this year, I'd bet it's more like 80%.

So, it's more than "nothing", but it's probably only a small "something". :D

Even the big climb in Portland, as easy as it ended up being, is still enough of a worry that both Kurt and I made sure our harnesses were nice and snug before mashing the pedal. :cool:
 

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
Todd Adams said:
The problem I have is that you said it was "nothing" I never said it was not getting easier for competitors but it is still something!

OK, so my "nothing" and your "nothing" are completely subjective at this point.

Todd Adams said:
And it would be something to you if you tried it in your LC so don't brag like you have or that it would not be a big deal to try it in any rig.

I didn't say it wouldn't be a big deal in any rig, but I don't think it is a big deal at all in Carl's rig. My reasoning... I get FAR more scared as a passenger on obstacles than I do driving the same thing. And I don't get scared on the climbs like I used to. I have ridden with Carl on all of the recent climbs (including Matterhorn) and really, Carl makes it so smooth, no tires spinning, etc.

Where did I brag that I had tried it in my LC? It was built with ZERO intentions of being a competetive rockcrawler... it wouldn't make it up a fraction of the obstacles without being destroyed... apples and oranges.

I guess my (speaking for myself here) beef is this... A guy rolls a rig on a bonus obstacle, gets hurt at his own fault and now everyone is pointing the finger at UROC. This insane obstacles didn't suddenly start, nor did the introduction of injuries. Skinny at St George, Aaron Cloughs spotter in St George that was run over on a HARDER climb a couple years ago @ UROC. Think of all the moneypits... I stand by my words that the Moneypits in the past have been WAY harder than the last few comp climbs (not including the bonus which I think was of equal difficulty).

What has happened... drivers have stepped up their intensity... Can be good, can be bad...

Todd Adams said:
One of the reasons accidents happen is that we get complacent about certain things. Bob was complacent about not having his harness tight because nothing up to the point of the incident that has created all of this banter had him to the point he thought it needed to be tight. So if you say the Matterhorn is nothing, I believe you are being complacent among other things about it. Don’t ever be.

Agreed, but even though I have no fear riding on those obstacles... I will still tighten my harness, but your right it will keep people (including myself) thinking in the future.

Todd Adams said:
After all he is the driver not you. All the spotter can do on these types of obstacles is just watch.

I ride Todd, walking around makes my legs tired... :D
 
Last edited:

cruiseroutfit

Cruizah!
Moderator
Vendor
Location
Sandy, Ut
Todd Adams said:
This was not Rock Crawling.

This brings up another important point which I touched on above...

Rock crawling as we know it, doesn't sell to the spectators. The Portland and Phenoix events really drove that point home. In both cases, spectators constantly flocked to the "climb" obstacles, even when other obstacles offered far more technical rockcrawling, betting view and less people surrounding you. It was bad enough that the UROC officials were trying to figure out a way to get spectators to go watch the other half of the event. We were on the technical side the first night, our first couple obstacles had literally 0 spectators. I was initially thinking it was due to the fact that all the spectators wanted to watch the Unlimited guys run... but come day two when we are on the climb style obstacles, we got the fanfare and the other side of the courses were again rather empty.

So, how do you get the spectators without the "extreme" side of the sport. Afterall, technical rockcrawling (though very intense, talent and skill based) isn't that extreme when you think about it (from the outside looking in).

I don't want to see every obstacle turn into a boring climb... the past events since the Matterhorn have not. The climb in question was a BONUS, as long as UROC keeps it that way, good to go :D
 

Todd Adams

Grammy's Spotter
Location
Salt Lake City
cruiseroutfit said:
This brings up another important point which I touched on above...

Rock crawling as we know it, doesn't sell to the spectators. The Portland and Phenoix events really drove that point home. In both cases, spectators constantly flocked to the "climb" obstacles, even when other obstacles offered far more technical rockcrawling, betting view and less people surrounding you. It was bad enough that the UROC officials were trying to figure out a way to get spectators to go watch the other half of the event. We were on the technical side the first night, our first couple obstacles had literally 0 spectators. I was initially thinking it was due to the fact that all the spectators wanted to watch the Unlimited guys run... but come day two when we are on the climb style obstacles, we got the fanfare and the other side of the courses were again rather empty.

So, how do you get the spectators without the "extreme" side of the sport. Afterall, technical rockcrawling (though very intense, talent and skill based) isn't that extreme when you think about it (from the outside looking in).

I don't want to see every obstacle turn into a boring climb... the past events since the Matterhorn have not. The climb in question was a BONUS, as long as UROC keeps it that way, good to go :D

First off I guess brag was a poor choice of words on my part. Instead I should have used the word arrogant which is really the way I took your statement about the Matterhorn NOW being nothing.

Yes I agree with this totally. So for us to get back to “Rock Crawling” we will have to do without the spectators maybe even the events. I know that I am not alone in this opinion.
Todd
 
Top