From what's up there right now I think #4 on both sets looks the best. I think they would come out the best for prints if thats your intention at all.Adding 2 more options....Google is going to take over the world.....
From what's up there right now I think #4 on both sets looks the best. I think they would come out the best for prints if thats your intention at all.Adding 2 more options....Google is going to take over the world.....
From what's up there right now I think #4 on both sets looks the best. I think they would come out the best for prints if thats your intention at all.
For web (atleast on my displays) 4 or 5 look the best. Like nanoman said, in 2 you loose all the highlights in the flesh tones, in 3 you start to get some of that back but not quite. 4 may be a tad dark though. 5 is probably going to be, IMO, the best choice.I am more concerned with web display....The lab Smugmug use is pretty good and they take care of the printing side very well.
Just want a fast way to get more pop into galleries of 50-100's up FAST.
that's so true, and something I've found from doing press work (and a little web here and there) is that most people won't ever notice the little things that stand out to you. Most people wouldn't have a clue about the "industry" terms and what they mean. I see things and they look hideous to me, but other people love them.This is becoming very interesting....different forums, different opinions, no clear favorite. It is interesting what different people focus on and what they like. I figured there would be some consenses but there really hasn't been. Eye of the be holder I guess.
It is sort of good in a way....
I really struggle with the post processing side of digi work....There are so many options and so many things that can be done, I am rarely satisfied and I am always trying to make it "better." But This is really showing that "better" is more subjective then I thought.
I like the customers that just want my raw files....
Thanks for the opinions!!!!
Keep them coming!