lol. And the human body is worth about a buck in raw elements. Give me a line on a supply of them for $27 please, I'll buy them all day long at that price. I'd get a sig loan to buy as many as possible at that price...you find me the supply, I'll cut you in on the profits.
A quick check for sold listings gives us....
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Cell-Phones...H_Complete=1&LH_Sold=1&_nkw=samsung+galaxy+s3
A little more than $27.
Did you know.....that companies like nextworth buy phones for a fraction of the market price so they can, get this, sell them for a profit? Holy schnikies! If only this had been brought forth earlier, you could have sold your iphone 5 for...
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Cell-Phones...rom=R40&LH_Complete=1&LH_Sold=1&_nkw=iPhone+5
Which seems like a little more than what you got for it.
Just being a smart ass, I know you probably sold it to them as more of a convenience because the extra money isn't that big of a deal...but you brought up the money part.
But the point about perceived value is spot on, and the android system is fragmented which makes it difficult for developers to create universally applicable software for them. They will never have the same following like the Apple fans and hipsters give to the iPhone, so the secondary market will never be the same. That, and Android technology is constantly changing and evolving creating a level of obsolescence to their line (but that is also the driving force behind new technology and why android devices are a couple years ahead of apple in terms of hardware technology (for example, actual 4g android phones existed about 2 years before the first iPhone was 4g (the iphone 4g, while cleverly named, did not have 4g capability). Historically, technological obsolescence has had a negative impact on resale value. Do you think Apple might understand that perhaps, and just perhaps, that enters into the equation as they roll out "new" technology in their phones? They aren't worried about Android phones making their phones obsolete, because their customers aren't buying on technology. They are worried about their new phones making the old phones obsolete, which would kill the secondary market, and it would potentially eliminate millions of people who can't afford the current phone thus lowering sales on fancy white or (GOLD!) accessories and itunes sales. New phone sales are subsidized, they make money on everything else. The new iPhone 5 just sold like a billion units..and for what? A new OS that the other phones get, a new color (OMG GOLD!..or would it be #gold?), and a finger print scanner that the NSA has access to? SWEET! You think all of those phone sales were from people who needed a new iPhone, or from people who would buy a buffalo chip from apple if they painted it white (or GOLD!) and gave it a hyped up release date? But what they did do is create a giant supply of used non-gold iphone 5's for the secondary market, so people with the iphone 3/4s will now have a more affordable way to jump to a flashier, 4g capable iphone 5 without signing a contract that would eliminate their grandfathered rate, and create new demand for the new line of cables, docks, and accessories that are needed because the 5 uses a different connection. Apple is no dummy, they know exactly who their customer is and where they make their money.