Wasn't there a privately owned park back east that had to close recently? Tellico maybe? Does anyone know the details of that closure?
Tellico is closed, but that's public land. The last one that made news would be Paragon in Pennsylvania. It was on a 25 year lease, and the lease was terminated and the property was sold. The land owner claimed the lease was terminated due to various breaches and violations of the lease agreement. The operators claimed it was just a ploy to close the park and sell the property for a nice chunk of money. Legally, the land owner won out and the property was sold. Another smaller park was later opened nearby.
While the private parks definitely have a place, look at the value AreaBFE brings to the 4x4 community, long term investing in such property should be the foray of private groups, not our "professional" land use organizations.
The most successful strategy remains cooperative participation with the management process rather than adversarial reaction to management decisions.
Recreational opportunity is only one of dozens of ways public land provides value to the country. System health and long term viability is paramount to any other services provided. This excuse can always be used for closure, whether or not it's "valid" in the eyes of this community.
Count the number of trail miles saved and restored by lawsuits and compare that to the number of miles saved and restored by our own users actively and aggressively participating in the management process as PARTNERS of land managers instead of enemies. The comparison isn't even close.
Some high profile examples include the work of MFFW in opening new routes, RR4W in preserving the safari trails around Moab, CC4x4 and the Hog Canyon system in Kanab, the cooperative work done by users in St George and Cedar City, Friends of the Rubicon, and on and on.
Anyway, just my thoughts. Good article.