Supergper said:in the same, I would like to know those (just about everyone) that think he is guilty, why do you think so? Based on the facts from THIS case that he is being judged on. Not his past case.
I do not know if it came up this time, but there is something strange about his peter that the victim from the early ninteys told the police about. When he had to come in and have it photographed the anomaly was there. The prosecuters had a stong case and then could not get the victim to tesify because of the payoff. Seems like paying off a victim should be thought of as witness tampering, but I guess the rich have a diferent form of Justice than the rest of us.
If you think he is inocent great. He would be happy to have your kids over for a slumber party and I am sure nothing improper will happen.