the Soviets took 30 years going broke not just a few in the 90's. It was not Reagan that can take credit for it either.
The Soviet collapse was a combination of many years of B.S. and hype. Paranoia was rampant and as mentioned above the Soviet leaders went nuts over it. You can credit Kennedy on up. The downfall was a culmination of years of build up and money wasted on both sides. I am just glad it wasn't us going out first.
This is just an overt ploy to divert attention away from Red Dawn isn't it . . .
As for the Soviets: they were doing just fine until the '80's. Yes Kennedy began MAD, which ultimately led to their bankruptcy . . . but they got a nice break during the 70's.
When McGovern and his hoards of little minions started going nuts over Vietnam, we got distracted (just like today) and stopped fighting the war.
Nixon was too busy chasing his own shadow to fight them, and Carter's presidency gave the Soviets enough time to re-group themselves, and it was Reagan who got us re-focused on the dangers the Soviets posed.
Reagan re-started the arms build-up again, and the Soviets fell soon after.
Although you are correct that Kennedy can take a large share of the credit . . . Reagan was the one who jump-started the process, and had the conviction to follow through.
Reagan was panned by both sides of the aisle for the arms race he resumed . . . but in the end, he was right, and proved all the nay-sayers (Kennedy, Kerry, Daschle) wrong.
It's ironic how fast we forget these lessons . . .