I happen to be on a SWAT team.....We don't just choose doors to knock down. It takes substantial evidence to obtain a warrant. First, you need probable cause. Next, attorneys review the case. Finally, it is signed by a judge prior to being approved.....
There had to be an imminent threat for SWAT to be serving the warrant in the first place.
It is sad to see that this former marine was a suspected drug dealer....
Remember a few months back in SLC when an active duty Army Soldier that was AWOL attempted to gain access to the Grand America tower in an attempt to injure and kill as many as possible??? He was armed with an AR15 that was equipped with an acog(and hundreds of rounds), two tack vests, and a ballistic helmet. An Officer was able to end his plan with a well-placed shot that saved countless lives. Everyone would be blaming the Police if the Army Soldier would have been successful. I have served warrants where the dealer had no drigs in their home. That is why the investigation happens prior to the warrant being served and not after. I am glad that no officers were injured during the warrant service.
Plain and simple, if you dont want SWAT knocking down your door-- obey the laws and don't deal drugs. Being a SWAT Officer is a dangerous job. I am glad no Officers were injured. It is a shame the former marine lost his life. My guess is any hesitation by the officers involved would have led to five funerals instead of one. None of the monday night quarterbacks can say exactly what the suspected drug dealers intentions were. Seems that the news needed a story and what you get is their understanding of what happened.
I can see your point clearly, and I have many family members, and close friends that are, or were active law enforcement. And I see that if they see a gun being pointed at them they have the action of deadly force, but they're are way too many "fishy" things in this story that makes me wonder what the real intentions of this was.
1. he was shot 71 times (If i remember correctly) Now if every officer was firing semi auto, that is a lot of trigger pulling by all officers, but once the guy is on the ground, wouldnt you think they would stop firing?? I just dont see the need for 70+ rounds being fired at one man.
2, paramedics didnt arrive for well over an hour after the shooting. Sure, maybe an investigation of some type was taking place, but that is a little cold blooded to wait that long.
Unfortunately yes stuff like this happens way too often. I remember not too long ago there was a big debate of a road pursuit/turned fatal shooting, where the family of the man shot released the dash cam footage of the whole thing. Long story short, the officers shot him through his closed window of his patrol car, after verbally warning him he was going to shoot him. (the suspect probably couldnt hear him between the officers window up, and all the sirens.) Then the amount of disrespect that came from officers after the shooting (audio on the dash cam video) it makes you wonder if there was other reasoning behind it.
But anyway, that is a totally different situation. I have the utmost respect for law enforcement coming from family history being around it, but I just feel this was a little over the line.