Anyone who thinks or thought that any vaccine was 100% effective is a non serious person. I am not anti vax. I just have zero incentive to get it. I've had Covid at least once and it was miserable. Why would I get a shot and feel crappy for a day or two when it buys me nothing. The moment my employer lets me take off the mask for my 12 hour shifts, I'll be the first in line to get vax'd. I need some incentive and that's enough for me. Hell I've put all sort of poisonous shit in my body of my own free will for no good reason.
What's super frustrating is the difficulty obtaining good information. My co-worker keeps sending me articles showing 40-90% of new cases being vaccinated people, the state health department took down the chart showing hospitalizations of vaccinated vs unvaccinated people but still show about 15-20% of new positive tests are vaccinated people. The main media is saying 99% of people getting hospitalized are unvaccinated but I can't correlate any of this info. I just settle back into my default, which is, if the right says 90% are vaccinated and the left says 99% aren't, it's probably 50/50.
I think you are correct in taking the 2 sides and going somewhere in the middle.
I read an article yesterday (can't find it now to link) so I'm going off memory but it was about the numbers in Lousiana, which has a low vax rate. It dealt with the reports that X% of hospitalizations are young people. What they found was that this number is misleading, but not inaccurate. They had found that the age group of 18-24 had an increased hospitalization rate from the winter peaks in January. The growth was around 65%. However, they also pointed out that the age group was only about 15% of hospitalizations back in the winter....now it's accounting for around 25% or something. The next age group of 25-44 was similar in growth, and accounted for around20% and 35% of the cases respectively. Now, they did find that of those numbers roughly 80% were unvax, but they did distinguish that this was "full vax" vs partial vax. Partial vax or full vax supposedly did account for approx 10% of the cases.
Where is it was more interesting was the older population of 65+ They used to account for 60+% of the hospitalizations in winter. Now they are accounting for around 12% for 65-84 and only about 8% for 85 plus. These groups were generally first to be vaccinated and likely, that contributes to it......BUT, they also point out that the overall hopitalizations are larger portions of younGER people...but most reports leave out what they consider younger. They also tend to leave out if they are using partial or fully vaxed.
So I always take both sides with a grain of salt. I do think you are much less likely to be hospitalized if you are vax'd, and because the younger segement is less vax'd then the older population, it also makes sense that they make up a larger % of the hospitalizations.
How severe are these hospitalizations? I don't know...but the general death rate is still lower....which again, correlates with past data. The younger population (<65) was a fair bit less likely to die from Covid....so, it stands to reason, that vax'd or not, if they are the ones going into the hospital more, the death rate would still be lower (as it appears to be so far)
I have noticed that more of the deaths reported in Utah are under the 65 age group. It is not uncommon to see 10 deaths in the under 45 groups in a given week, of around 35 deaths....when back in the larger peaks, that number was more along the lines of maybe 10, but in 3x the number of deaths in a given week.
I liked the article and will continue to look at it, because I felt it analyzed the data with a less biased POV and pointed out how the numbers are skewed.