anderson750
I'm working on it Rose
- Location
- Price, Utah
While we are at it, why don't we ask all these millennials to double up on the condoms so that we can slow the growth of offspring that will be raised by these snowflakes.
They've already dropped the birth rate below replacement level.While we are at it, why don't we ask all these millennials to double up on the condoms so that we can slow the growth of offspring that will be raised by these snowflakes.
@TRD270 Its a percent you gotta bump the decimal. 405000 of 328000000 (2019 estimated population) is .123475609%
The knock against 'co-morbidities' is still absurd. The simple fact is those are people who would not have died when they did if they did not become infected with the virus. To say they would have died anyway (years down the road for many) is heartless at best.And if you break it down even further and look at co-morbidities vs coronavirus only, the numbers are miniscule. Not down playing it at all, but if you use science and math to evaluate it, it will leave you scratching your head.
Medicare will pay hospitals a 20 percent “add-on” to the regular payment for COVID-19 patients. That’s a result of the CARES Act, the largest of the three federal stimulus laws enacted in response to the coronavirus, which was signed into law March 27.
I am a heartless MF when it comes to stupidity and there is a lot of stupidity going on. Here you go again making ASSupmtions on what is said. How is it absurd in relation to how the media and politicians are using it? Go back and do a little research on other times in history, H1N1, swine flu, a bad year of influenza and show me where comorbidities have been buried in the story line like they are with the Rona? I'll patiently wait for some data....and no I am not going to go and look for it, since it is not out there.The knock against 'co-morbidities' is still absurd. The simple fact is those are people who would not have died when they did if they did not become infected with the virus. To say they would have died anyway (years down the road for many) is heartless at best.
I believe you missed my point entirely. Both side report numbers in a way that panders to those that share their same views. I didn't "put it in decimals and it looks small". I reported actual numbers from the CDC and census and put them into a percentage ( the most simple way to compare a portion of one number in relation to the whole). I'm not looking for ways to make people scared or ignore the issue. I'm not looking for ways to describe the numbers to make them seem one way or the other. I posted facts and boiled those facts down to the real numbers. I've stated several times that I know people effected by this and 405000 (the death rate at the time of the post) is a serious health issue. My point is that those in power only report the facts in a way that benefits them. I would bet that most of us in any given 800 people we meet will have met someone who is going to pass in the next year for one reason or another. This is why I posted hard numbers, not some variation that makes the numbers "seem" one way or the other.How you present the numbers is interesting. Put it in decimals and it looks very small. Point out that we are nearing the point where 1 in 800 people in the US have died of COVID and it seems rather significant.
The knock against 'co-morbidities' is still absurd. The simple fact is those are people who would not have died when they did if they did not become infected with the virus. To say they would have died anyway (years down the road for many) is heartless at best.
I don't know where you are getting this info but it'a incorrect. We had over 300k more deaths in 2020 then in 2019......as per the CDC's own stats for all causes. (I'm not just taking the MSM covid death count either)the total number of 2020 deaths is within the annual average. The fluctuation is (IIRC) 30k+/-. The C-19 deaths haven't put the US beyond the annual average.
Yes the number of deaths go up every year...on average around 1-2%. I don't care as much about the cause of death because a death is a death...that's why I am using total deaths from all causes. That way, regardless if the person died of a heart attack but was coded as Covid it is still counted even if you look at the reduced heart attack deaths and increased Covid deaths.It's important to point out that 2020 was higher than expected and with the rising age of the population and decreased health, the census estimated our numbers will continue to rise to where we'll hit 2020-type numbers at the end of the decade. That's without Covid.
My medical degree (yes, veterinary medicine) has taught me how to understand and apply the idea of comorbidities. I do know how they work.That's not how comorbidities work.
I didn't "put it in decimals and it looks small". I reported actual numbers from the CDC and census and put them into a percentage ( the most simple way to compare a portion of one number in relation to the whole). I'm not looking for ways to make people scared or ignore the issue. I'm not looking for ways to describe the numbers to make them seem one way or the other.
I can tell you with a fair amount certainty that at least in some states this is untrue. I obviously won't give any names or locations, but I personally know several medical professionals from doctors and nurses in COVID wards to administrators that have personally verified that the change to diagnoses is almost always going in the opposite direction ( at least in the locations these people work). They are being required to report anything that MAY be COVID related as a COVID death. The idea is to look for more federal and state funding as well as recoup lost income from other patients that are not seeking care. Not saying its right, but I understand the thinking. Again this is information from people I know and trust, not just internet sleuth "data".Before the state declares a death as COVID related all medical records are carefully reviewed and a positive test does not always result in the death being listed as a COVID death. After further review they will even remove someone from the list of COVID deaths if additional information (autopsy, pathology results etc.) changes the diagnoses.
I agree with you that the comorbidities that are contributing to Covid deaths are technically a bigger problem. However your assertion that the comorbidities that are contributing to Covid deaths are at almost as high a risk with other sicknesses/viruses is quite a stretch.Dr. @Houndoc the vast majority of covid-19 deaths are of people with comorbidities and what? Those folks are at risk EVERY flu season. We're ALL just talking about it now.
Comorbidities are actually a worse problem than covid because it puts those people at greater risks in all sorts of different ways. That's not a knock, they've killed more people and will continue to do so.
Yes, if covid magically disappeared, they wouldn't have that specific risk anymore but around every corner there's a threat. But, we live in a world that doesn't really consider that.
Because the cure for the flu is RONAMy question about how sickness and deaths are documented is this: Why do we have pretty much zero people getting sick with the flu this season? Here is what the Utah Health Dept says about flu-caused hospitalization over the last 5 years:
View attachment 134539
I also find this very curious. I suspected a decline because of the general decrease in people doing things in groups and going out, and a general increase in personal sanitation/hand washing. Still seems odd.My question about how sickness and deaths are documented is this: Why do we have pretty much zero people getting sick with the flu this season? Here is what the Utah Health Dept says about flu-caused hospitalization over the last 5 years:
View attachment 134539