They are just enforcing the law. If you don't like the law, write your legislators. I don't think it's a totally unreasonable law.
i agree
They are just enforcing the law. If you don't like the law, write your legislators. I don't think it's a totally unreasonable law.
In CA that is illegal...
Getting back to the original post though. It used to be that your tires could stick out 1-2", but then when they re-wrote a bunch of the laws, they changed it. That change happened quite a few years ago though.
Well even worse now....I went to another place that passed it on the flares..however they wouldn't pass the body lift.
I know body lifts aren't liked by most. However, I have had it for a few years now.....this is the first year I have had a problem. It is a 3" body lift, and because it sits on the original mounts, it makes it 4" of lift total.
........
They are just enforcing the law. If you don't like the law, write your legislators. I don't think it's a totally unreasonable law.
What, you don't want another 10-page rant against mud-flap and fender flare laws thread?
......
What, you don't want another 10-page rant against mud-flap and fender flare laws thread?
Me neither.
Need to cover the tires, pure and simple. And remember that even if you get it passed by switching tires, doesn't mean you may not be ticketed down the road. I would think it would be easier just to add flares.
My biggest concern is that the law is only being enforced on people / vehicles that are closer to obeying the laws and the people with blatant modifications are just being passed up.
the guy with a full size pickup, 38"+ tires, tall stacked lift blocks (and other unsafe suspension hacks... I've even seen these rigs with FRONT lift blocks!), hacked in steering, and other seriously ill modifications get by with no problems?
i agree
See thats another thing i'm sketchy about is the 3rd brake light, i see TONS of jeeps out there with after market tirecarries and no 3rd breke light.