BlackDog
one small mod at a time
- Location
- Proudly Deported to ID
asked this over on planet, so it will be a repost to those of us that swing both ways....
But there are some awesome minds here that DO NOT swing both directions, and are RME explicit.. so here goes...
had an F 350 with a ZF42 and a 1356 trans t-case combo
1356 dies.(IDI truck)
Replace with 1356 from behind a half ton E40D
(Came out of a Bronco, wouldn't you call that a half ton?)
Worked awesome
Contemplating a NP435/208 to replace my E40D/1356
(rear driveshaft out of 1356 is a slip yoke, 208 uses a U joint to connect shafts)
Life would be simpler if I were to install a NP435/1356....
Everything is Ford derived.....
Million Dollar Question:
Will my BW1356 bolt directly in place of the NP208?
Bolt circumference where t-case bolts to attaching point, is fairly close.... seems logical to me (and at the same time doesn't) that the spline count shaft size will be the same, as I believe the NP435 bled its way onto the assembly line after the 1356 came into vogue.. and simplicity is key to low $$$ production.
But there are some awesome minds here that DO NOT swing both directions, and are RME explicit.. so here goes...
had an F 350 with a ZF42 and a 1356 trans t-case combo
1356 dies.(IDI truck)
Replace with 1356 from behind a half ton E40D
(Came out of a Bronco, wouldn't you call that a half ton?)
Worked awesome
Contemplating a NP435/208 to replace my E40D/1356
(rear driveshaft out of 1356 is a slip yoke, 208 uses a U joint to connect shafts)
Life would be simpler if I were to install a NP435/1356....
Everything is Ford derived.....
Million Dollar Question:
Will my BW1356 bolt directly in place of the NP208?
Bolt circumference where t-case bolts to attaching point, is fairly close.... seems logical to me (and at the same time doesn't) that the spline count shaft size will be the same, as I believe the NP435 bled its way onto the assembly line after the 1356 came into vogue.. and simplicity is key to low $$$ production.