You missed my point bud but thats ok.
I don't have a problem with people taking a winch over an obstacle, or taking a strap or not wanting to thrash their rigs (dude, I lead a group of 50 grand cherokees around moab every june, I understand the 'don't scratch my paint mentality'). What I don't understand are people that do a trail that is over their head and just expect other people to wait for them until they've been dragged though it. When people get into positions they are not prepared for what do they do?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
They take or make a bypass. And if not they get into positions they don't want to. If you don't want to thrash your junk then why take it on a difficult trail like Constrictor or Pritchett. I don't think it's right for people to go out to hard trails and make them easier just the same as I don't think it's right for people to go out to easy trails and make them more difficult.
A trail should remain true to it's rating---what is Constrictors rating? 5. Go look that up in the guide book--it'd be the one harder the 4+ which says body damage likely, lockers needed, etc. etc. So if you don't meet the requirments then why on earrth would you change the trail so you can make it?
and honestly, comparing winching the rock pile to winching the end of constrictor is apples and oranges. I've seen YJ, TJ's, WJ's, ZJ's, XJ's, toys etc. on 33-35's do the rockpile without rocks without problem. I think I have video of Mike Llib in his WJ driving the rock pile--its more intimidating than difficult and if you are intimidated by big hard obstacles, then do a trail without them (there are lots
) I would rather see someone do a less difficult trail than make a bypass around it so he can say they did Pritchett Canyon....
So, you can adjust my attitude if you want I guess, but at least understand what I'm trying to say before your bravado takes over.
Cody
Klif--where the hell were you tonight?