New bank time

Skylinerider

Wandering the desert
Location
Ephraim
I've never been charged any fees for banking at Zions. I've got free checking, free online bill pay etc. etc. I almost went with a CU for the loan on our Accord, but it was way easier to just keep it with Zions also. I have nothing against CU's, my sisters all use them.
 

StrobeNGH

no user title
Location
WB
So, for all those who think that CU's are great, you are basically saying that you are okay with unequal taxation on corporations so long as the corporation makes you feel warm and fuzzy, and gives you slightly lower "fees?"

You do realize that the amount of money you save by banking with CU's over banks is only a fraction of the amount of money CU's don't pay in taxes (but ought to)?

Let's say that Zions has to pay $1,000 in taxes a year, and they charge you $100 in fees every year.

America First is paying $200 in taxes, and charging you $80 in fees.

So, for providing the same service, America First is only saving you $20, while they are saving $800 from the taxes they don't pay.

The figures are not exact, but hopefully you get the idea.
CU's were intended to be NOT FOR PROFIT, but don't be fooled: they are raking you through the coals.
Their rates are slightly better than banks, but their taxes are significantly less . . .
So where is the money from tax savings going? It certainly isn't going into your pocket.

Banks: GE
CU's: Enron
 

92XJeeper

Member
Location
Ogden
Whatever!

I enjoy paying less interest and getting superior service with my credit union than with any bank that I've used. As a CU member, I also have a say (vote). Not so with banks.
 

cannoncrawler

TWERNT THE MORMONS!!!!!!
Location
Idaho
All I know is that when I was with a bank, they never remembered my name. they when we were up against an obstacle, the bank said we can't. the CU always remembers my name and my kids names, and they never say they can't, they say heres what we got to do to make this work. same answer, worded differently, entirely different results. I don't give two shits about anything except how me and my family is treated and CU's always are glad to have me. Banks I was just another number. They can all go to hell.
 
Last edited:

Caleb

Well-Known Member
Location
Riverton
So, for all those who think that CU's are great, you are basically saying that you are okay with unequal taxation on corporations so long as the corporation makes you feel warm and fuzzy, and gives you slightly lower "fees?"

You do realize that the amount of money you save by banking with CU's over banks is only a fraction of the amount of money CU's don't pay in taxes (but ought to)?

Let's say that Zions has to pay $1,000 in taxes a year, and they charge you $100 in fees every year.

America First is paying $200 in taxes, and charging you $80 in fees.

So, for providing the same service, America First is only saving you $20, while they are saving $800 from the taxes they don't pay.

The figures are not exact, but hopefully you get the idea.
CU's were intended to be NOT FOR PROFIT, but don't be fooled: they are raking you through the coals.
Their rates are slightly better than banks, but their taxes are significantly less . . .
So where is the money from tax savings going? It certainly isn't going into your pocket.

Banks: GE
CU's: Enron


I think you are missing the entire point...Banks = Fees, CU = no fees (not "slightly lower fees")

I've never been charged a single fee for any service with any of my CUs. I also get better rates than any bank can offer. Doing very simple math why would you not bank with a CU over a bank? :confused:

If you really think CUs are so evil then why don't you do something about "it"...oh yeah, that's right banks tried to but got shut down :rofl:
 

cannoncrawler

TWERNT THE MORMONS!!!!!!
Location
Idaho
I can't stand them, especially because all they do is cry when legislation is proposed which would allow the government to tax them on the same level as banks are taxed.

That being said: go with Zions. I own stock, and want it to go up more!

sounds like we have the same reason for not liking each others choice......They take money out of our pockets..........(I am grateful you can empathize with me);)

Zions charged me fees, and Credit Unions hurt your stock. life is tough!!!
 

waynehartwig

www.jeeperman.com
Location
Mead, WA
All I know is that when I was with a bank, they never remembered my name. they when we were up against an obstacle, the bank said we can't. the CU always remembers my name and my kids names, and they never say they can't, they say heres what we got to do to make this work. same answer, worded differently, entirely different results. I don't give two shits about anything except how me and my family is treated and CU's always are glad to have me. Banks I was just another number. They can all go to hell.

:applaud:

It's not just CU and against banks, though. It's all about customer service. The banks don't give a rats ass, and the CU's do. I'm going where the customer service is the best. I don't care what kind of place it is, if I'm treated poorly, I will not return and they will not recieve a dime from me. So if it were me, I'd sell my Zion's stock and put it in Dell instead and open up an account at a CU! :D
 

Cody

Random Quote Generator
Supporting Member
Location
Gastown
So, for all those who think that CU's are great, you are basically saying that you are okay with unequal taxation on corporations so long as the corporation makes you feel warm and fuzzy, and gives you slightly lower "fees?"

You do realize that the amount of money you save by banking with CU's over banks is only a fraction of the amount of money CU's don't pay in taxes (but ought to)?

Let's say that Zions has to pay $1,000 in taxes a year, and they charge you $100 in fees every year.

America First is paying $200 in taxes, and charging you $80 in fees.

So, for providing the same service, America First is only saving you $20, while they are saving $800 from the taxes they don't pay.

The figures are not exact, but hopefully you get the idea.
CU's were intended to be NOT FOR PROFIT, but don't be fooled: they are raking you through the coals.
Their rates are slightly better than banks, but their taxes are significantly less . . .
So where is the money from tax savings going? It certainly isn't going into your pocket.

Banks: GE
CU's: Enron

lol, Enron? Oh come on now. I think you know how ridiculous that comparison is so I won't even get started on it.

It's not like a CU is the only organization that operates 'not for profit' and turns a profit. Look at the Sierra Club, Surdna, LDS Church (or many churches for that matter), politicians etc etc. Some are more ethical than others--CU's are saving me money and I'm struggling to find a problem with that. I'm also dealing with Chase bank right now on an issue and I'm beside myself at the level of indifference they exhibit towards me and my business--but I'll try and not let that clowd my argument.

So the CU's are taking advantage of the government by allowing people to have a place to put there money--pseudo-cooperatively--where they can take advantage of legislative loopholes allowing them to pay less for the same services that the robber barons worked so diligently to get us to pay for. It's legal and if someone makes money by saving me some then I'm ok with that. Accountants do it all the time. Aristotle is probably trying to crawl out of his grave to strangle you and your support of usury being passed upon the common man in the effort to pad the coffers of the upper class.


Maybe pick a better crusade? Nobody is stopping you from wasting your money.

Cody
 

spencurai

Purple Burglar Alarm
Location
WVC,UT
lol, Enron? Oh come on now. I think you know how ridiculous that comparison is so I won't even get started on it.

It's not like a CU is the only organization that operates 'not for profit' and turns a profit. Look at the Sierra Club, Surdna, LDS Church (or many churches for that matter), politicians etc etc. Some are more ethical than others--CU's are saving me money and I'm struggling to find a problem with that. I'm also dealing with Chase bank right now on an issue and I'm beside myself at the level of indifference they exhibit towards me and my business--but I'll try and not let that clowd my argument.

So the CU's are taking advantage of the government by allowing people to have a place to put there money--pseudo-cooperatively--where they can take advantage of legislative loopholes allowing them to pay less for the same services that the robber barons worked so diligently to get us to pay for. It's legal and if someone makes money by saving me some then I'm ok with that. Accountants do it all the time. Aristotle is probably trying to crawl out of his grave to strangle you and your support of usury being passed upon the common man in the effort to pad the coffers of the upper class.


Maybe pick a better crusade? Nobody is stopping you from wasting your money.

Cody
Oh no he didn't just drop Aristotle on that ass? KAAA CHOWWWW You can't argue with Presocratic Greek Philosophy!!
 

chadr

Active Member
Location
Hurricane, Utah
CU's are cooperatives and thus member owned. They have board members that are elected by the members who make the decisions for the Cooperatives.

I work for a rural Electric Cooperative which is non profit, but they have to pay their employees somehow. Ask yourself how a non profit organization pays their employees. They have to have revenue from somewhere and someone has to govern how much their employees are paid annually.

I read from a memo that we had that our cooperative is exempt from taxes under IRS Code 501 © (12) because not more than 15 percent of revenues are derived from sources other than electric consumers.

CU's are probably under some sort of exemption also.

Just my 0.02
 

Cody

Random Quote Generator
Supporting Member
Location
Gastown
hey, he's the father of modern thought...and the only person I could think of off the top of my head that wrote in opposition to usury.

;)
 

StrobeNGH

no user title
Location
WB
The Enron thing was for dramatic flair . . . :)

I'm really hoping that there is a semantical understanding going on here.
First, the only CU's I hate are those which are banks posing as CU's, such as America First.
Second, when I speak of "fees" I am mostly referring to the interest rates charged on loans.

So far, the only major differences between banks and CU's that has been brought up here is that CU's have lower loan rates, and don't charge you any fees for Checking Accounts.
Correct?

Dealing with Checking Account fees first: If your bank charges you fees to use your checking account fees, and you pay them, you are foolish. I haven't paid fees on any of my checking accounts, ever, and there is no reason why you should have to either.
Not all banks tack fees onto their checking accounts . . . but this has already been covered by others.

Now, Usury:
Are you really saying that banks are lending money at a higher interest rate than is permitted by law? If you have any evidence of usury being practiced by a bank I strongly encourage you to report them to the Attorney General's office, where appropriate action will be taken to remedy such practices.

It is true, however, that banks do charge higher interest rates than CU's do (I would say that they charge slightly higher interest rates than CU's do, but Aristotle might have a problem with the competing interpretations of "slightly," so I'll forbear . . . the last thing I want is Aristotle being mad at me, b/c Alexander was his boy, and he'd rock my world).
The reason why banks charge higher interest rates is simple: They have to stay in business somehow. Banks don't have the luxury of paying the lower tax rates which CU's pay (even though they provide identical services). This is reflected primarily in the different interest rates CU's and banks charge.

But answer me this: If CU's are the holy grail of financial institutions, and are completely altruistic, why aren't their rates SIGNIFICANTLY better than banks rates are?
Yes, I realize that CU's have overhead to cover, but if CU's were simply covering their overhead, and not holding back profits, their rates would be substantially lower than a bank's rates, not slightly.

There are "legitimate" CU's out there . . . examples are UP&L CU, Federal Employee CU's, University CU's etc . . . These types of CU's are legitimate, in that the serve a defined segment of the population (work, trade, school, religion, etc . . .).
The exception to the rule that America First, Mountain America, and the likes, are taking advantage of is an ambiguous definition of "defined segment" in Utah.
To these CU's, a defined segment of the population is "anyone who has $50."
All Zions, and the other banks, were trying to do with their legislation a few years back was to clarify what "defined segment" meant.
They were not trying to shut down all CU's . . . just those operating as banks (i.e. serving all of the public, instead of a defined segment thereof).
But, the big CU's mounted an effective marketing campaign which pulled the wool over the public eye, and the ambiguity was not dealt with.
The big CU's were safe to continue defrauding the government.

If people want to pool their resources and form a CU, more power to them . . . but my problem arises when some enterprising people decide to form a bank, but call it a CU to take advantage of the tax exemption CU's enjoy, and I can not believe that more people aren't incensed at this practice.

Let's be completely honest, the ONLY difference between America First CU and Zions Bank is that America First doesn't pay taxes.
THAT is what makes me so mad about this. Imagine how much more money the state would have if America First would pay its fair share of taxes . . . heck, your income taxes might even go down (or the government would find a way of spending the extra money, which is the more likely scenario).

So:
Banks: Josey Wales
Large CU's: The crooked Union officer posing as good guys
Small CU's serving a legitimately defined segment of the population: the innocent people Josey Wales was traveling with.

P.S. I checked around PA for CU's similar to America First, and the likes . . .
they don't exist out here b/c "defined segment" is not ambiguously defined out here.
So, America First and Mountain View could be a "Utah thing"

Holy crap that was long
 

Cody

Random Quote Generator
Supporting Member
Location
Gastown
Holy crap that was long

And well written/supported.

I see what you're saying, although I don't necessarily have a problem with the situation.

So what about an institution such as Granite Credit Union that was formed for employees of Granite School District but allows anyone to come there if they buy a $25 dollar 'share' in the union?
 

StrobeNGH

no user title
Location
WB
And well written/supported.

I see what you're saying, although I don't necessarily have a problem with the situation.

So what about an institution such as Granite Credit Union that was formed for employees of Granite School District but allows anyone to come there if they buy a $25 dollar 'share' in the union?
Thanks. Law school is doing something good for me after all.

I think that GCU has overextended themselves . . . or gotten greedy.

I have no problem if employees of the Granite School District want to form a CU, but if they want to enjoy the tax benefits, their CU ought to only be available to Granite School District Employees.
As soon as they open it to outsiders, their exempt status ought to be revoked.

Also, there is a difference between forming a CU "for" employees, and forming a CU "by" employees. It isn't grammatically correct, I know, but CU's are to be formed BY people, not FOR them.

I guess I'm just overly sensitive to people/organizations which I feel aren't paying their fair share of taxes . . . especially this time of the year.
 

cannoncrawler

TWERNT THE MORMONS!!!!!!
Location
Idaho
thank you for the well written response.

the fact is that I went to Zions to get an account set up because I was moving to utah and my current credit union didn't operate there.

I was told no because I had a checking account years earlier that had some bad checks written on it and was closed, despite my 695 credit score (later repaid)

went to st. george and was greated warmly at Southern utah credit union and they have my business.

again, I don't care if the C U manager is a anti ******, flaming homo that dresses up like paris hilton at night and dances in a cage, covered in peanut butter.

If they treat me like a person with feelings, goals, dreams, and setbacks, and help me through it all, then they have my business.
 
Last edited:

StrobeNGH

no user title
Location
WB
thank you for the well written response.

the fact is that I went to Zions to get an account set up because I was moving to utah and my current credit union didn't operate there.

I was told no because I had a checking account years earlier that had some bad checks written on it and was closed, despite my 695 credit score (later repaid)

went to st. george and was greated warmly at Southern utah credit union and they have my business.

again, I dodn't care if the C U manager is a anti ******, flaming homo that dresses up like paris hilton at night and dances in a cage, covered in peanut butter.

If they treat me like a person with feelings, goals, dreams, and setbacks, and help me through it all, then they have my business.

My FIL works for UP&L, so my wife has an account at their credit union.
We discovered that there is a CU network which allows you to make deposits at ANY member CU . . . we found a CU in the back of a catholic school back here (literally in an old classroom in the back of the school), and we were able to deposit a check in her UP&L CU account from PA.

Check with your old CU to see if they are a member of this network. If they are, you can deposit your check at any other member CU and it'll get to your account.

As for Zions not giving you a checking account: as a general rule (not speaking about your situation specifically), I can't say that I blame them.
I spent 2 years doing collections for bad checks . . . you would be floored by the amount of bad checks people write. In one month, we would have, on average, $15 mill come into our firm.
Also, when I worked at the bank, we had a run of bad checks come through (check kiting) . . . they cause a lot of problems.
I am sure that Zions, like any other bank, would step over their own mother to get their hands on your money, so considering this, how do you think they feel about bad checks?

The fact is, when a company gets to a certain size, they don't always have the luxury of treating you like an individual.
Just remember that Zions isn't the only bank in Utah . . . they're just trying to be!

Edit: I would edit your 4th sentence. Some people here might take issue with such statements.
;)
 

Caleb

Well-Known Member
Location
Riverton
The fact is, when a company gets to a certain size, they don't always have the luxury of treating you like an individual.

yeah right, I don't care the size of any corporation, company, firm, etc, they can all still treat you like an individual if they want to. ;)

You bring up another good point about CUs though, you can withdraw money from ANY CU ATM and not be charged a service fee for it.

I have nothing against banks, my brother always tries to get me to bank at his bank (he's the assistant branch manager at Zions in South Jordan) but I refuse to pay for services I can get for free, not to mention pay higher rates.
 
Top