I think its good to have stay, lots of people wouldn't know their tie-rod-ends or balljoints or u-joints or brake pads/rotors etc are about to fail because lots of people don't have the "feel" for that stuff. I also don't feel that the argument "if they want to have that stuff checked they can go to a mechanic" is a good or valid argument because I think a large number of people, maybe even a majority, would not ever go into a mechanic unless like said before, the equipment fails. I also fear that if people don't have someone inspecting their vehicle with the possibility of a safety-failure, then they would be heavily inclined to "jimmy rig" parts, unsafely and as inexpensive as possible to just get by.
I think safety inspections are a major piece of preventative maintenance for vehicles that make it required. But don't get me wrong I'd be all for getting rid of mudflap/flare laws.
I think safety inspections are a major piece of preventative maintenance for vehicles that make it required. But don't get me wrong I'd be all for getting rid of mudflap/flare laws.