glockman
I hate Jeep trucks
- Location
- Pleasant Grove
Your 30 second search provided proof of what Stephen is saying.Get off your "it's OK if Liberals do it" high horse.
Obviously the proposed reforms apply across the board.
He is some cases a 30 second search reveals.
![]()
Report: Harlan Crow Has a Stake in 4 SCOTUS Cases — and Thomas Hasn’t Recused
Crow’s financial interest in the cases, as uncovered in new exclusive research, could sway Thomas’s decisions.truthout.org
![]()
Supreme Court Did Review Case Involving Harlan Crow—Contradicting Clarence Thomas’s Claim
The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal filed by an architecture firm suing a company that was part of the Crow family real estate portfolio in 2004.www.forbes.com
One of the conflicts that they called out is Chevron deference. How do you claim that is a conflict for Thomas and only him?
![1722456224493.png 1722456224493.png](https://www.rme4x4.com/data/attachments/135/135067-33838beaa0f1c73aa2ba0cdf7d45bfe5.jpg)
EDIT: Dude, did you even read these? The first link pretty much states that any and all cases the involve real estate or wealth are a conflict because Harlan Crow owns real estate and is wealthy.
Here are the cliff notes
Conflict one- Crow may benefit from Chevron Deference because it affects 20k agency rules and one of those deal with fair housing.
Conflict two - Crow may benefit from removing the eviction moratorium enacted during covid because one of his companies filed 122 evictions.
Conflict three- Crow may benefit from changes to the ADA because he owns an apartment complex that was sued and had to install ramps and pay $75k in damages.
Conflict four - Crow will benefit from a law that would ban creating wealth taxes because he is wealthy.
This is the proof of conflict of interest you are touting?
Last edited: