clfrnacwby
Recovery Addict
- Location
- NV
Just saw this on KSL...I think it could generate good discussion.
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=30411538&nid=148
Is there really an economic impact either way? If we can save money by standardizing on a time rather than switching twice a year, I'm all for it. I believe the misconception for many is that DST actually GIVES us more hours in the day, which it does not...it's just relative to the time you see on the clock (although it's fair to argue it gives us more USABLE time). In our day and age, does it really matter if the sun goes down at 8pm rather than 9pm during the summer, besides convenience? Maybe that's the whole point of DST?
I'd be interested in other thoughts...
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=30411538&nid=148
Is there really an economic impact either way? If we can save money by standardizing on a time rather than switching twice a year, I'm all for it. I believe the misconception for many is that DST actually GIVES us more hours in the day, which it does not...it's just relative to the time you see on the clock (although it's fair to argue it gives us more USABLE time). In our day and age, does it really matter if the sun goes down at 8pm rather than 9pm during the summer, besides convenience? Maybe that's the whole point of DST?
I'd be interested in other thoughts...