SuperRanger
Registered User
- Location
- Colorado Springs
It has been posted twice by Tim on the UROC website that custom frames are now legal in the modified class. We all have a lot invested in this class and (at least in my case) don't want to see it get changed into a buggy class.
If you are impacted by this rule change please send Ranch or Mark an email. Thier addresses are:
Ranch@uroc.com
Mark@uroc.com
I have tried to point out to them that:
1) This is an illeagal rule change per rule 3.3 (Notification will be given thirty days prior to an event for vehicle specification changes). The post on the UROC forum states it will take effect immediately.
2) This largely defeats the purpose of the class.
3) They have not solicited input from those affected by the rule change. I (and others) have posted recommendations, sent e-mails, and had phone conversations and have been given no answers as to why our ideas are unacceptable.
4) The new rule is more vague than the last rule. It is full of loopholes and has no technical information. There is no minimum wall thickness (safety issue), definition of what is considered to be the frame, or overall min. - max. dimensions.
5) It is stated that there will be new restrictions to ensure the purity of the class. Why not wait until we have these ironed out before the release of a poorly written rule? Are these new restrictions going to make my rig illeagal? Nobody can start building until these restrictions are out.
6) The purpose of this rule change (to my knowledge) is to make 1 out of over 60 vehicles in this class legal. As it is, the rule worked. It was determined a rig was not within the rules. The problem is not the rule but the enforcement of the rule.
If you are impacted by this rule change please send Ranch or Mark an email. Thier addresses are:
Ranch@uroc.com
Mark@uroc.com
I have tried to point out to them that:
1) This is an illeagal rule change per rule 3.3 (Notification will be given thirty days prior to an event for vehicle specification changes). The post on the UROC forum states it will take effect immediately.
2) This largely defeats the purpose of the class.
3) They have not solicited input from those affected by the rule change. I (and others) have posted recommendations, sent e-mails, and had phone conversations and have been given no answers as to why our ideas are unacceptable.
4) The new rule is more vague than the last rule. It is full of loopholes and has no technical information. There is no minimum wall thickness (safety issue), definition of what is considered to be the frame, or overall min. - max. dimensions.
5) It is stated that there will be new restrictions to ensure the purity of the class. Why not wait until we have these ironed out before the release of a poorly written rule? Are these new restrictions going to make my rig illeagal? Nobody can start building until these restrictions are out.
6) The purpose of this rule change (to my knowledge) is to make 1 out of over 60 vehicles in this class legal. As it is, the rule worked. It was determined a rig was not within the rules. The problem is not the rule but the enforcement of the rule.