Wacko Jacko
- Thread starter Rusted
- Start date
Spork
Tin Foil Hat Equipped
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, UT
Spork said:
Skylinerider
Wandering the desert
- Location
- Ephraim
I'm one who said he is innocent. Now I really don't give a rats @ss either way, but it seems like this kids parents are trying to get money and nothing more. I fully agree with the rest of the world that he is the craziest guy on the planet. Maybe he is guilty and I'm crazy too. Either way I'm not losing any sleep over it. Just my $.02
Chiksic
Resident Stoner
- Location
- a cloud of smoke
I saw some interview thing a while ago that made me think he's innocent. I don't know much about it, and I don't care to know, honestly. Frankly I think it's lame it's getting so much media attention. I have a handfull of friends who've been molested by family and/or close friends of the family, and I think it's pathetic MJ is getting so much attention over it. I wish they'd take half the money they've spent on MJ's case and go hunt down the other losers who've f****ed with my friends lives. But, back to the point, I think he's innocent because of that interview deal. I don't remember much, but he was saying kids don't get enough intimacy now and I completely agree with that. TVs and computers have turned into babysitters. Kids need people and love. If MJ's story is true, I give props to him. If it's not true and there's more going on than sleeping, I expect the jusicial system to take him down. But only God knows.
waynehartwig
www.jeeperman.com
- Location
- Mead, WA
Like the OJ thing, I can't wait for it to be over! I'm tired of hearing about it. Hang the freak by his balls and let's get on with our lives.
In my mind he is guilty because of the past case. No one pays $25MM+ in a settlement if they are innocent. And if someone was innocent and just paid to just make it go away, then they would do everything in the power to not let themself get into the situation again. At the very least, they would make sure that there was always a couple witnesses when they were with the kids and they wouldn't be taking kids to their bedroom.
Ya the family was out to get money from Jackson, but that doesn't mean he didn't molest the kid.
Ya the family was out to get money from Jackson, but that doesn't mean he didn't molest the kid.
I haven't really followed much about the case but from what I keep hearing is that the prosecution did not prove their case. Nothing has been proven, the only thing thats been proven is MJ has a very weird life. Yes he had homo sexual porn in his room but there is nothing illegal about that. Judging him on his LAST case is the only thing that might get a conviction...which in my mind is a sure sign our judicial system has failed. He is being tried on THIS case and his actions with THIS kid, not his past actions. He probably is a molestor, but it has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
and no, I haven't voted (cause the option "Could care less isn't up there")
and no, I haven't voted
(cause the option "Could care less isn't up there")
DrMoab
Active Member
- Location
- Fruit Heights Ut
For me its the whole...Looks like a duck...walks like a duck...most likely a duck.Supergper said:
I don't know all the facts of this paticular case...I haven't been watching too close. However he has admited that he sleeps with young boys in his bed. Who does this??? If I was on that jury I would have to look at past cases...I think in child molestation cases you have to...because once it happens it will happen again. Even child molesters will tell you...Once it happens it WILL happen again and....Hasn't he payed twice already to shut families up?
Technically there has never been a single other case...he may have paid off another family BUT their settlement of approx 25M was supposedly cheaper than going to court and paying all the attorney fees. So using the amount to say who would pay that isn't justifiable...I'm jsut wondering what happened to our court systems...isn't someone inocent till proven guilty? He's never been proven anything and yet people always use the excuse "based on past cases"...there have never been "past cases"
waynehartwig
www.jeeperman.com
- Location
- Mead, WA
Supergper said:
...And even if there were, he's not on trial for them. He's on trial for THIS one, and this one alone. The only way the jury can even consider past circumstances is if it was presented as evidence during the trial.
personally I think he is guilty. Like it was mentioned before... who does that stuff? It must suck getting portrayed as a freak but like Dr Moab said, "looks like a duck, walks like a duck..." Regardless of what happens in this trial I think people should start punishing the parents of these kids. WTF are they thinking. I know that if someone that my kid played with has a history of sexual abuse regardless of the outcome I still couldn't be comfortable letting him in that type of environment. I am sure these are people out to find cash but why would you put your kid through that? I don't think that it would have been taken to this level if there weren't some type of good explaination for the litigation.
Dude's a freak.... the parents are stupid.... my kid will never go to Neverland Ranch. Besides that... I still like "Thriller"
Dude's a freak.... the parents are stupid.... my kid will never go to Neverland Ranch. Besides that... I still like "Thriller"
- Location
- Grantsville, Utah
It was admitted at this trial. The accuser from 1993 gave testimony on the stand. I have listened to E! channels coverage of the whole trial. This guys testimony was the most chilling. The current accuser and his family are just as wacko as Jacko, but that doesn't mean there wasn't molest there. The family is so disgutsting that, in the end, the jury will not convict Jacko because they do not want to see this family milk the court for more money.waynehartwig said:
Spork
Tin Foil Hat Equipped
- Location
- Saratoga Springs, UT
http://anomalies-unlimited.com/Jackson.html
Just had to share...
The dude is 47 I don't think normal people would be having the kids stay the night at this guys house.
Just had to share...
The dude is 47 I don't think normal people would be having the kids stay the night at this guys house.