...Do you honestly consider that a Land Cruiser, or just a marketing ploy by Toyota to capitalize on the LC craze by putting a new dress and a tilt-o-meter on the dash of a 4runner platform?...
The FJC is not a Land Cruiser, never has been never was. An it absolutely was inspired as a marketing craze, but lets not let that detract from the actual LC. The cult following derived from its service to owners, not the other way around, that has led to them being so desirable. Discount relic restored and rare Land Cruisers, even a common soccer mom 80 Series demands a higher price amongst the off-road crowd, because your getting what you pay for imo. I'm not saying the Toyota is the end all for overland type travel, anything could feasibly be built to do it and often cheaper, a Rover, an Explorer, a JK makes a killer platform, XJ's obviously. But professionals touring the world don't choose a Tacoma because of the LC craze
...Because the extra power and ability to go faster than maybe necessary are not benefits. Why did you search so hard for the supercharged taco again?
...
Same reason I chose a vehicle with grey interior, because I can. It wasn't a huge breaking point in fact the truck I went to put money on was non-SC (but grey interior
) I had zero problems making my non-SC Tacoma go anywhere I needed to in a hurry. But why not consider the SC anyways? Its 100% factory supported, dealer stocked and dead nuts reliable. I've never heard of a single field failure with a SC despite gobs of abuse by some. I consider it an option just like 4WD and power windows, if you needs call for it, do it.
...If you are comparing the ZJ to the mid 90's LC, then the jeep also has disk brakes on all 4 corners, weighs 1500-2000 lbs less, is more fuel efficient (exept the 4.0, that motor sucks gas offroad), and there are more people in the states that make aftermarket parts, and just a higher volume of cheap part donors out there. Some of the other knocks on the ZJ are true--rear axle sucks, unibody, etc. There isn't much argument pro for the d35 (or the 44hd in 96-98 V8's), the unibody for a light trail/expedition vehicle isn't going to have any problems. It can take plenty of abuse.
So the one thing I see is fuel economy? A moderate built LC can still pull in 13-15 mpg, whats the ZJ getting? There are more parts suppliers your right, but not that specialize in outfitting them for this type of US, you won't find too many manufactures selling long arm and ultra-flex kits for the 80, just as you won't find manufactures making rear panel water bladders and drawer/fridge systems for the ZJ, they inspire a different aftermarket following. Sure there are a lot more spare parts available for the ZJ? Is that not telling in itself? I'm yet to discover an item that is a "must carry" for an 80 owner? Can't say there is one for the ZJ but with all this talk of spare parts there must be some worry in the back of your minds? Based on my experience with the WJ (my wife had one for two years when we first got married), would be a half dozen spare engine sensors (that failed at 30k mind you) for the motor and enough super glue to keep the interior trim from rattling loose driving down the highway.