So, it's up to someone else to get you out of an area that's going to be hit?
I'm not saying that the NO refugees were blameless, I'm just pointing out one pretty big difference between the two events.
tell you what, if I was in the path of a major hurricane and I didn't have a car, I'd still find a way to get out.
I'm positive that even with no transportation and a limited budget you could get out of an area, but don't you think it would get a little complicated when EVERYONE else is also trying to get out of Dodge?
If I didn't have a car, no one in my family had a car, and none of my neighbors had cars, and we were told to evacuate SLC . . . it would be a pretty challenging task if there were no public transit alternatives.
And, if you were accustomed to the government caring for all of your needs, the situation becomes even more complicated.
These people were accustomed to their government (state and local) caring for them . . . so when it came time for them to be evacuated, I'm sure a lot of them expected the government to take care of them.
The state/local government dropped the ball,a nd we know the rest of the story.
The lesson: if you are going to insist on government programs to take care of everyone and their dog, you had better be prepared to follow through in ALL instances, and be dependable.
Otherwise, the goverment should stay out of people's lives and let them be accountable for their own wellbeing.