Jesser04
Well-Known Member
- Location
- Kaysville Utah
Fox is the worst. I’m more of Jeffrey toobin cnn kinda guy myself.I am glad you brought up Rivera and Fox (where Rivera recently worked) since that is where many Conservatives get their "news."
Fox is the worst. I’m more of Jeffrey toobin cnn kinda guy myself.I am glad you brought up Rivera and Fox (where Rivera recently worked) since that is where many Conservatives get their "news."
How is this any different than the liberal echo chambers of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc?I am glad you brought up Rivera and Fox (where Rivera recently worked) since that is where many Conservatives get their "news."
I am glad we don't have a video chat feature on RMEFox is the worst. I’m more of Jeffrey toobin cnn kinda guy myself.
I agree, and can apply this same logic to the opposition. I have more books than anybody I personally know. However, you'd probably say they were "wrong think" type of books. So is the argument that if it exists in a book (new or old) then it's more true or more valuable than any public discourse on the internet?Political discussions always devolve into something that reminds me of an Epictetus saying "it is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows". I know, I know. Books bad. Boo to books. Still seems pertinent.
There is a culture of un-elected bureaucrats who want dearly to hold on to their deep state way of life. It's an occulted club, so to say. To say they are either liberal or conservative leaning is just misdirection and doesn't matter. I like to think back to when JFK stated that we should “splinter the C.I.A. in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” Nothing totally happened to him.So the narrative here is that the letter agencies, (which must be controlled by liberal government?) were the ones actively inciting the mob. So a bunch of liberal leaning government actors were dressing up as conservative actors and joined with known white supremacist leaning groups (groups that are lead by minorities, awkwardly) and other citizens, being egged on by a conservative president (I would use the word demagogue) to overthrow an election that they won?
You have your POV, and much of what you said is correct. We live in a dumpster fire and Biden is contributing to it.....but to act like it all happened when he got into office is a bit of a disservice to much of the rest of your argument.I'd gladly go back to how the Country and World were running while he was in office, compared to the dumpster fire we have now. As soon as old Joe got into office, he signed Executive Orders severely hampering our then current and future energy production. Immediately markets responded, and inflation started to rise. Then MASSIVE deficit spending, and inflation really took off. We are around 30% across the board for inflation, since early January 2021.
Yeah, Bidenflation.
You summed up their theory perfectly.Political discussions always devolve into something that reminds me of an Epictetus saying "it is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows". I know, I know. Books bad. Boo to books. Still seems pertinent.
I haven't been following much in the way of national politics, but as a skeptic, some of this is confusing to me.
So the narrative here is that the letter agencies, (which must be controlled by liberal government?) were the ones actively inciting the mob. So a bunch of liberal leaning government actors were dressing up as conservative actors and joined with known white supremacist leaning groups (groups that are lead by minorities, awkwardly) and other citizens, being egged on by a conservative president (I would use the word demagogue) to overthrow an election that they won?
I certainly agree that both sides are playing the fiddle and are in cahoots as I am firmly anti partisan politics as it's constructed currently in our privately funded political system, but something in that story doesn't stack up. What am I missing?
Until Congress gets back to doing budgets......which the uniparty hates, our deficit spending will have no controls put on it. Its interesting how the media and most of the liberals call the Republicans who are vocal about needing to get back to financial responsibility MAGA repbulicans. That term is now the new boogy man.You have your POV, and much of what you said is correct. We live in a dumpster fire and Biden is contributing to it.....but to act like it all happened when he got into office is a bit of a disservice to much of the rest of your argument.
The economy condition can not be put at the foot of Biden solely. Trump played a good role in it, as did Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. The low interest rates for so long helped contribute to it, but really, Trump, and the Covid funds (remember, he started giving free money out) is really what contributed to it. The inflation was a LONG TIME coming.
The deficit spending has been going on for decades, and Trump as NO better at it. In reality, if you look back as soon as Bush left and the '08 crisis happened, deficit spending has been huge.....and yes, Biden and Obama have the largest years on average (adjusting for Trump's covid year) but to act like the massive deficit spending is all related to Biden is just disingenous. There are also world wide factors that need to be taken into account. Biden's years have been large due to Covid and Ukraine. Also, remember, that Congress really holds the purse in the US, so, while Biden is bad, the House is really the problem....and for some of the bigger deficit years, it was controlled by the R's.
I'm just saying that when you present information, having a little objectivity is good.
Biden is a mess, the country is in trouble. I don't think Trump will help AT ALL, and I am sick of both parties putting up candidates that the majority of Americans don't even want running. Just my $.02 ($.005 due to inflation)
"it is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows"You summed up their theory perfectly.
And the defense here on RME is that the CIA killed JFK, so I guess that ends the debate.
You summed up their theory perfectly.
And the defense here on RME is that the CIA killed JFK, so I guess that ends the debate.
Until Congress gets back to doing budgets......which the uniparty hates, our deficit spending will have no controls put on it. Its interesting how the media and most of the liberals call the Republicans who are vocal about needing to get back to financial responsibility MAGA repbulicans. That term is now the new boogy man.
This was the point I was trying to make.I'm going out on a limb here, but I don't think things have gotten clearer and less corrupt since then
The counter to Heraldo is CNN's Chris Cuomo actively advising his brother while actively running a show as a "journalist" . Then couple that with his grandiose exit from his basement quarantine when he never was quarantined. He was seen out and about during the period he claimed to be living in his basement. These people are all liars and I'm dumfounded people believe any of them.I am glad you brought up Rivera and Fox (where Rivera recently worked) since that is where many Conservatives get their "news."
Until Congress gets back to doing budgets......which the uniparty hates, our deficit spending will have no controls put on it. Its interesting how the media and most of the liberals call the Republicans who are vocal about needing to get back to financial responsibility MAGA repbulicans. That term is now the new boogy man.
You have your POV, and much of what you said is correct. We live in a dumpster fire and Biden is contributing to it.....but to act like it all happened when he got into office is a bit of a disservice to much of the rest of your argument.
The economy condition can not be put at the foot of Biden solely. Trump played a good role in it, as did Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. The low interest rates for so long helped contribute to it, but really, Trump, and the Covid funds (remember, he started giving free money out) is really what contributed to it. The inflation was a LONG TIME coming.
The deficit spending has been going on for decades, and Trump as NO better at it. In reality, if you look back as soon as Bush left and the '08 crisis happened, deficit spending has been huge.....and yes, Biden and Obama have the largest years on average (adjusting for Trump's covid year) but to act like the massive deficit spending is all related to Biden is just disingenous. There are also world wide factors that need to be taken into account. Biden's years have been large due to Covid and Ukraine. Also, remember, that Congress really holds the purse in the US, so, while Biden is bad, the House is really the problem....and for some of the bigger deficit years, it was controlled by the R's.
I'm just saying that when you present information, having a little objectivity is good.
Biden is a mess, the country is in trouble. I don't think Trump will help AT ALL, and I am sick of both parties putting up candidates that the majority of Americans don't even want running. Just my $.02 ($.005 due to inflation)
That's why he's so interesting. The absolute hatred from the establishment put a spot light on so much corruption from that side and well actually, both sides. BOTH SIDES hate him. That tells me something. That made me look deeper. The TDS is a real phenomenon and it's wild!As for Trump helping, The leftist media will continue the smear campaign.
I genuinely think Trump(ism) is a cancer on democracy. But man, watching the wokesters implode every time he ticks up in the polls is extremely satisfying. Almost makes it worth it.I like him because everybody I don't like hates him. I know, not a really good way to go at things but it's been fun.