Has he been 'convicted' of anything at all to actually meet those requirements?The Constitution sets requirements for president. Far from new to have someone removed from the ballot for not meeting those requirements.
This is correct, not the arbitrary ruling of the Maine Secretary of State or the capricious reading of the 14th Amendment by the Colorado Supreme Court.The Constitution sets requirements for president. Far from new to have someone removed from the ballot for not meeting those requirements.
I will just leave it (and get back to my previous habit of trying to stay out of the political discussions) at saying post Civil War they did not hold trials to convict anyone of insurrection, so the argument that the 14th Amendment only applies if Trump is convicted of a crime doesn't hold up.Has he been 'convicted' of anything at all to actually meet those requirements?
Ok, so by that logic then pretty much every democrat candidate should be disqualified by the mere fact that most of them supported the "mostly peaceful" riots that burned down buildings all over America in 2020. Cool!I will just leave it (and get back to my previous habit of trying to stay out of the political discussions) at saying post Civil War they did not hold trials to convict anyone of insurrection, so the argument that the 14th Amendment only applies if Trump is convicted of a crime doesn't hold up.
I know my personal opinion also doesn't hold any legal value, but encouraging his supporters to march on the Capitol where they came prepared for violence and calling for the murder of the VP seems like a reasonable standard to disqualify someone to run for president.
There was no insurrection. The evidence is very clear that the feds and the DC police were the prime drivers behind the guided tour. No police were killed, no politicians were injured unless they tripped over themselves running away.I will just leave it (and get back to my previous habit of trying to stay out of the political discussions) at saying post Civil War they did not hold trials to convict anyone of insurrection, so the argument that the 14th Amendment only applies if Trump is convicted of a crime doesn't hold up.
I know my personal opinion also doesn't hold any legal value, but encouraging his supporters to march on the Capitol where they came prepared for violence and calling for the murder of the VP seems like a reasonable standard to disqualify someone to run for president.
Right, but most of the people who were convicted of insurrection we also members of either the Confederate government or the military, so there really wasn't much need to hold trials since there was documented evidence that they had risen up against the United States of America.I will just leave it (and get back to my previous habit of trying to stay out of the political discussions) at saying post Civil War they did not hold trials to convict anyone of insurrection, so the argument that the 14th Amendment only applies if Trump is convicted of a crime doesn't hold up.
I'm not going to wade into the swamp of retardery that is the January 6th debate. But what I will say, again, is that the proper, constitutionally legal way to bar Donald J. Trump from holding office in the United States again using the 14th Amendment was to impeach and convict him. The Senate failed to do so, so here we are. You want someone else on the Republican ticket, head to your local GOP Caucus event in March and persuade your fellow constituents that Utah should select someone with better credentials than him.I know my personal opinion also doesn't hold any legal value, but encouraging his supporters to march on the Capitol where they came prepared for violence and calling for the murder of the VP seems like a reasonable standard to disqualify someone to run for president.
It is alarming to me people actually still believe any media source.
You’re trolling us. Please tell me you’re just trolling us. You can’t be serious about these comments. I mean, it’s amazing!
I realize that the last election was over 3 years ago, but I would expect the “winning “ party to be more excited about their accomplishments.
But what I will say, again, is that the proper, constitutionally legal way to bar Donald J. Trump from holding office in the United States again using the 14th Amendment was to impeach and convict him. The Senate failed to do so, so here we are. You want someone else on the Republican ticket, head to your local GOP Caucus event in March and persuade your fellow constituents that Utah should select someone with better credentials than him.
This Ray Epps?Until the FBI and other 3 letter agencies comes clean with how many under cover operatives they had in the crowd like Ray Epps, it will not change my belief that the deep state added enough fuel to the fire to take this from a march to the Capital steps to entering the building. It is very clear on the released video that Capital Police and other officials let people in and even escorted them around.
Here is my thought of the day........our 3 letter agencies are as much or more of insurrectionists as any civilian that was there that day.
Wikipedia is not exactly a truthful resource, but I’ll entertain your tomfoolery. The Ray Epps that the DOJ has only recently charged after 3 years but has never been arrested when he is on video inciting people. The Ray Epps who the FBI director will not confirm or deny if he has ties to a 3 letter agency. The Ray Epps who has been reported to have worked for the CIA.
I don't like Trump, I think he's an egotistical ass hole and I wish he would just go dark for a decade. However his presidency highlighted the depth of the establishment. Major media on both sides blatantly lied repeatedly to defend their entrenched stranglehold on information. I should have emphasized I mean major media. There are lots of independent media sources now and they are the ones I review just as you have stated.Look at that not through a lense of partisan politics.
How does anyone become informed without the media? That basically leaves person experience as the only source of knowledge which is seriously limiting.
Best approach in my opinion is to get information from multiple news sources, with different political leaning.