I'll say it again, with meaning this time:
**** that.
You stack rocks to get up , YOU move them when you're done.
That is not a poorly thought out sentiment, it's the right thing to do. If you need the rocks, then the onus is on YOU to remove them for the next guy.
Back to the issue, I'll be calling Julee tomorrow to tell her that the sign will be addressed, and asking for any input she's got. I'm sure she will be excited to hear that steps are being taken to fix it, as she is likely not aware of it yet.
Kiel, Bodine, and I, among others, have been working with her for a while now on clarification of the RS/Con trails, SPECIFICALLY to address the bypasses, which they want closed just as much as we do, for the same reasons: erosion, unsightliness, etc. The trails themselves are wash bottoms and as such present no similar ecological concerns AS LONG AS THEY ARE MAINTAINED AND CLEANED UP!!
I can't stress enough that the bypasses and trash are what draws attention, not a rock-colored cement pile. Heck, I'll buy a tub of SuperGlue and stick more rocks on it so it looks like a naturally occurring formation, wtf.
Anyway.
Also, one of U4WDA's mission principles is to act as a sort of clearninghouse for 4wd projects in the state, to present a unified front, so I'm happy as a clam to see people debating the issues, to wit: RS/Con are getting messed up, what can be done?