Steve
Who Cares?
- Location
- Grand Junction, CO
Actually, I believe that the participants pay the "thousands of dollars each year," not the club that simply passes the money through them. Big difference there...drtsqrl said:Not their event!? Who pays thousands of dollars each year for permits and insurance? RR4W.
I was going to stay out of this thread after my first couple of posts, but I can't let this go without a response. If you're actually worried about what's BEST for the land, you'd permanently close the trails like SUWA and others want. It's not a very big step from your comment above to SUWA's position.drtsqrl said:...the best thing that could happen for the sake of our trails (and ultimately, that is all that really matters), would be to have all the trails exclusive use for the entire week of Easter Jeep Safari.
In all of the arguments about this here, on PBB and on other boards, I guess what chaps me are several things:
1. The trails in Moab are, for the most part, on BLM land. That means it's owned by all of us, whether we belong to RR4W, some other club, or no club at all. I personally don't agree with closing public land to me in order to cater to a private group or event. Yeah, I know it's done at the Rubicon, but simply saying it's done there doesn't make it right for Moab or anywhere else.
2. There's a lot of rhetoric about "what's best for the trails," but the only reason stated in the permit for trail closures is to "avoid congestion." That doesn't address protection of the trails, it simply says "we don't want to be bothered by anybody else while we're on the trail."
3. There is also a lot of rhetoric that basically is saying "if you don't belong to RR4W you have had no part in keeping Moab's trails open." That's simply BS. I belong to other orgainzations and support them with my time and $. I comment on issues and attend public hearings. I take part in trail cleanups. Sorry, I won't "join" a club or organization by simply sending them $ without having any vote or say in their decisions, so I'm not a "member" of RR4W.
I never thought I'd see the day when 'wheelers would close trails on public land to other 'wheelers unless they pay for the privilege of running those trails, which is really the bottom line here. If you're willing to pay $50 to run a trail on public land with a large group, you're good; if you aren't you're bad or a "renegade" according to some posts. Simply wanting to run a legal trail on public land without paying $50 to be part of a large group does NOT make one a "renegade" wheeler.
Last edited: