???
Okay, now I’m really confused... Those pics are all on
established trails. Very established trails!! Usually only visited by atvs, but still established trails.
I still stand behind every pic on the site, and hey, if SUWA or any other org. wants to start it, then bring it.
Here is my opinion on this... since no one felt the need to email me...
I have been searching out old ghost towns and mines for the past 17 years. In that time I have seen more and more trails closed, and more and more areas destroyed.. Not due to someone 4 wheeling or off roading, but just due to "taking it" from the "preservation orgs".
So my thought is this.. What is the last "historical site" that you saw any environmental group close?? Can I get a big 0!! None, however, they are on my back as well, calling mines and ghost towns scars on the land.
I’m not saying to desist current efforts, but I think the time has come to bring the fight to the environmentalists instead of sitting back and waiting for their next move.
This is how it has seemed to go: (note these groups are only for example)
SUWA: "we want to designate this 50000 area as wilderness, there are hardly any trails on it and it should be preserved."
OFF ROAD GROUP: “No way, we won’t stand behind that"
SUWA: That’s fine, we don’t care, and we will petition our contacts.
OFF ROAD GROUP:FINE!!
SUWA: or we could give you access to this little trail and 5 acres to off-road on if you get on board with this action.
OFF ROAD GROUP: Okay, yeah, we got five acres, we showed them!!!
Remember a few years ago when they tried to close some trails up little cottonwood and other canyons? Their argument was that the trails were hardly used and so they should be shut. The thing that kept the majority of them open was the fact that they were access roads to mines, which a lot of the off-road trails are. Some are less used than others, but they all go somewhere. The sites that were directly linked to mines were not closed, however the nature nazi orgs still feel the need to go put up signs and try to pretend that they are, because if no one drives on it and it becomes overgrown then they have more weight to their argument to close. So what if each of mines and ghost towns could be designated as a historical site, is SUWA going to try and block access to a historical site?? Maybe, but the USDA is more interested in promoting economic growth, (more historical sites, more stuff to see in Utah, more people come to the state and increase the tax base) So establishing these areas as historical would cut SUWA and other preservation groups directly out of the picture.
This entire concept is pretty hard to explain in text but hopefully you get the jist of where I’m going. I (usually) don’t break trails off road, and I don’t destroy things, I don’t shoot up old cars or burn old buildings.
And 99% of the time I am bringing home other peoples trash that was left on site...
But if you still think I'm wrong, that’s fine, like I said; if it disturbs you don’t look at it. The stuff I do may not be on the same page as the 4WDA, which is exactly why I am not a member, no one can associate me with any 4WD group, and as such, my actions are my own.
HOWEVER!! if going through mud puddles at high speed is destruction of the trail, I am guilty, and I can assure you I will strike again!!!
To close, please don’t take any of this as antagonistic, I understand that I’m not going to please everyone, but I’m doing what I think is best to preserve what is out there for as long as possible.
I came to this board because it seems like the majority of the people here are interested in visiting these sites and I would like to make them all more well known, trails will be cut in this effort I’m sure, but we will get by, after all if someone didn’t step off the trails, we wouldn’t have these mines or ghost towns to go visit, right??
My offer holds to take people out when we go, I usually post up the info here, and I don’t take any offense.
geez... if I had a dollar for everyone I ever pissed off, I wouldn’t need donations!!