- Location
- Sandy, Ut
Are you unable to see question marks? that usually implies a question not a statement.
positive.. $$ for U4 ?
Proof. Hmm. Well, let's play this your way.
We claim Walker made an illegal bypass. You claim we are trying to blackmail or extort him. I'll make you a deal. You supply proof of your claim that is undeniable, and I'll show you some pictures.
So, until you can prove that, then everything else you are calling for is a moot point.
You mean these?
I addressed that here
Are you unable to see words?
Sami, I'm glad you've made contact with WER (although I want a notorized transcript and/or video link to the converstion before I believe it actually happened). Hopefully something positive comes from it. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.
You and U4 have had the opportunity to deny that you are trying to extort but have failed to provide proof. only asked me to provide proof that you are doing something that I only asked if you were doing. so I don't see how it is a moot point. you are not denying that you are extorting only that I can't prove it witch I can't that is why I asked in public giving you the opportunity to respond..
Are you finished? BTW, please don't PM your childish comments.
-Jason
I will be finished when you post the pics up
No matter what you think of me or my reasoning stating that you (U4 and RR4W) are going to take care of this behind the scene and unless Walker atones ($$?) for his alleged mistake you won't post the pics is how most normal people would state extortion. That is screwed up.
if you don't want me to continue responding to your questions stop asking them
I will be finished when you post the pics up
No matter what you think of me or my reasoning stating that you (U4 and RR4W) are going to take care of this behind the scene and unless Walker atones ($$?) for his alleged mistake you won't post the pics is how most normal people would state extortion. That is screwed up.
if you don't want me to continue responding to your questions stop asking them
You and U4 have had the opportunity to deny that you are trying to extort but have failed to provide proof. only asked me to provide proof that you are doing something that I only asked if you were doing. so I don't see how it is a moot point. you are not denying that you are extorting only that I can't prove it witch I can't that is why I asked in public giving you the opportunity to respond..
It was page 2 and 3 that there was some talk about a work group over memorial day weekend. Sunday maybe? WE ARE NOW ON PAGE 11!
:tara:GO TEAM!:tara:
So is Sunday going to happen? I am with a group that had planned on running Prichett that day and would like to help.
See post #141
At 5:00 PM today, Walker Evans and I have just finished a long chat about Pritchett Canyon. I’ll paraphrase our conversation from some basic notes I jotted down during the conversation:
I explained to him that there has been a recent discussion on the Internet forums that has created concern within the motorized community. I explained the best I could (From Jeff’s description) the damage that Pritchett sustained this year, and how his group was identified as one that traveled on an unauthorized bypass. In our conversation, he was genuinely concerned that the motorized community is upset at him and the group that he was with on Pritchett. He said that he became aware of this situation today and was surprised that something that had occurred over a month ago came out now.
He acknowledges that they took the bypass, but stated that it appeared well traveled and that it was a newly established bypass. He asked that I understand that he has been involved in the motorized community for many years, and that he would not knowingly do anything to jeopardize his reputation in the motorized community. He also mentioned that the group of rigs that they were traveling in was well equipped to assist the broken rig that was on the obstacle, they waited a while before choosing the bypass as they would have preferred the obstacle.
We talked about the other damage that Pritchett has experienced this year, and how the trail is extremely important to RR4W, MFFW and U4WDA. Walker has a closer understanding of what effort goes into the year round maintenance of this and other trails, just in the name of keeping them open. Ironically, we touched on how the closure of Coyote may have some relationship with the heavy use that Pritchett experienced this year. Walker expressed interest in coming out and participating in the service projects that are upcoming on Pritchett, but said that an upcoming trip will conflict with any projects over the Memorial Holiday, but is interested in what is planned afterwards. I said that I would keep him informed of the efforts that will be taken to permanently block the bypass, including future projects that follow Memorial Day.
As our conversation ended, we talked about the importance of the motorized community keeping the Tread Lightly message strong, and how Walker Evans Racing has been promoting responsible motorized recreation for many years – and that they do not wish to have that changed. He seemed truly bothered that there was any bad feeling about what they thought was a legitimate bypass. I assured him that the bypass was unauthorized, and he was truly apologetic for the misunderstanding.
Steve Edmunds
President, U4WDA